MovieChat Forums > U.S. Marshals (1998) Discussion > Did Glock sponsor this movie?

Did Glock sponsor this movie?


I've never heard the name Glock so often in a movie as in U.S. Marshals. I don't think that Tommy Lee Jones & Co. did it for free.

reply

Glock don't need any more advertisment, they're already making a boatload of cash by selling their guns to everyone. And everyone who have an interest in getting a gun are bound to know about glock

reply

Not anyworse than the Lethal Weapon movies and Riggs damned Beretta. Ugh Beretta92s!

http://www.myspace.com/53745668 I aim to misbehave!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

well what?

---
"How many minutes before we can have the sex?"

reply

Boz_705... Do you have a problem with Beretta M9s???

reply

I guess I should answer this question two years later! hahah

Yeah, the 92F or M9 is just a bulky paper weight! I carried one for almost four years. I know carry a Glock 22 and 27. I am also a fan of the Sig.


The Beretta 92F is a pinto compared to a Lexus (Glock).

http://www.myspace.com/thetexanhasspoke I aim to misbehave!

reply

Sig is good, I own one. Glocks may be reliable, but they are so uncomfortable to hold, its not even funny.

-------------------------------------


(-_-)

reply

Coca Cola outspends every other company on the face of the planet in advertising. Do you really think Coca Cola needs advertising? You don't understand advertising.

reply

"Glock don't need any more advertisment"

They did at the time. Glocks were first imported into the U.S. in '85 and mostly collected dust on gun store shelves until the early 1990s when Glock came up with the brilliant marketing strategy to sell them to as many police departments as possible. If most cops were carrying Glocks it would give them "cred", which would drive civilian sales. So they offered their plastic guns to police departments at well below their competitor's prices (their competitors being primarily Beretta, SIG, and S&W), which they could easily do because plastic and stamped steel are both cheap as dirt. They sent out representatives to police departments with their cheap pistols and duped them with the "Safe Action" slogan. It probably went something like this:

Moritz: No one is buying our plastic pistols.

Florian: Ahem... we use the term polymer around here.

Moritz: But all plastic is a polymer, and so is rubber and wool, for that matter.

Florian: Yes, but plastic sounds cheap, while polymer sounds all sciencey and high-tech and stuff.

Moritz: Okay, fine. No one is buying our polymer pistols.

Johannes: What if we could get police departments to buy our plastic...

Florian: Polymer!

Johannes: Right, polymer. What if we could get police departments to buy our polymer pistols? That would give them cred with the general public.

Moritz: But how do we do that?

Johannes: Simple. Our plastic...

Florian: Polymer!

Johannes: Yes, yes. Our polymer pistols only cost $75 each to manufacture because injection-molded plas... er... polymer is dirt cheap, and so is stamped steel. Beretta, SIG, and Smith & Wesson have to spend way more than we do to manufacture their aluminum frame pistols. So we'll just undercut everyone else by a huge margin.

Moritz: Brilliant! But what if the police departments have safety concerns?

Johannes: We'll just refer to our trigger mechanism as Safe Action®. No one is going to call Safe Action® unsafe.

Moritz: Not bad, not bad at all. But what if they want some proof? You have to admit that a 5.5-pound trigger with only a half-inch of travel is a lot more prone to accidental discharges than a traditional 12-pound double-action trigger with an inch of travel.

Johannes: We'll do a drop test. Our plastic...

Florian: Polymer!!

Johannes: Our polymer pistols don't go off when dropped.

Moritz: Most guns don't, but what does being drop-safe have to do with anything? Nearly all accidental discharges are due to someone accidentally pulling the trigger, and our trigger-mounted passive safety does nothing to prevent that.

Johannes: I don't want to catch you saying that ever again, especially not in front of any prospective buyers. Our guns are drop-safe and they have a Safe Action® trigger, therefore they are safe!

reply

The Glock is the issued handgun to the US Marshals. Also, it is the most issued handgun for law enforcement worldwide.

Largely due to the fact that it is the most reliable handgun made!

Yes, I really like Glocks. Yes I "owned" a Glock 19, which I have sold since I wanted something smaller for conceiled carry.

Before anyone decides to start nay-saying the Glock handguns in response to this post... Please. Most of what you hear concerning "problems" with the Glock's is fiction.

I'll start with this one point, as a great many people beleive this to be true, largely due to the totally bogus statement made in the movie Die Hard II. No! It was never "invisable" to Airport X-Ray machines. The slide and barrel on the handgun is steel, and has always been made of steel.

HK, Smith and Wesson, Beretta, etc... are all using polymer in their select models of the handguns they are making.

A deliberate and successfull attempt to capitalize on the reliability of the Glock's was done by Springfield, with their XD series of handguns.

Also, one of the most revered retired US Marines, and subsequently also a damned fine actor R. Lee Ermey is now the spokesman for Glock in the US, and he has stated that the new Glock ammo, known as the .45 GAP (Glock Action Pistol) should be the new ammo for the US Armed forces in regards to their choice for sidearms.

I can get even worse being "pro" Glock, but I will leave it that way for now...

Bleu Cheese Salad Dressing is made on the Moon! My Uncle from Mars told me, so I know it's true!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

"Gun nuts", as you put it, have contributed far more to the good of this nation as far as winning wars and keeping the peace than anyone with an irrational fear of guns has.

A gun is an inanimate object. A piece of steel. It's only dangerous when it's in the wrong hands, just like a baseball bat, a knife, a car, a chunk of firewood, or a rolling pin.

From birth to the present day, (I'm 39) I've never lived in a house without guns in it. Not because I'm a "gun nut", because my family, myself and some of my/our friends use them in recreational pursuits. In all that time none of us have ever been harmed in any way by any of those guns. Knowledge of their capability, respect for them and careful use are the keys.

reply

[deleted]

Anybody notice TLJ is holding a 1911 in the movie poster? That's a shame, considering the only one to carry one in the movie is Snipes.

reply

I love it when Americans like Charlton Heston and now tc708mm defend gun ownership by saying they are inanimate objects that dont do any harm in the right hands or a good gun (Charltons line) in good hands only worries bad people blah blah blah blah blah blah

Well let me tell you something......

If you can buy an auto in America and have a free shotgun thrown in or you can have any number of so called good people buy a gun as easily as buying a packet of breakfast cereal and in turn these "good people" (I am smiling here) can onsell it to someone offering enough cash then pretty much you can see where all this is leading too.

So some kid can now have a hissy fit at school and noob all his detractors if he can break into the family gun depositry instead of dealing with the situation like a normal rational human. Anyone can blow up at work and wipe out half the post office sorting department. Anyone can hate local politics or Washingtons foreign policy and can carve a hole into a boot of their sedan and snipe the stuffing out of people filling their cars up at the local gas station. Gangs can inititiate new members by driving past some old lady wheeling down to the supermarket with a spray of bullets.

Gee whizz quite a good country you have in the US. And these gun owners claim they are defenders of the American way and freedom.

Grow up. No decent community needs gun ownership. If you want to play with guns then join the military or law enforcement or a target shooting association. Anyone outside of that who possesses a gun should be given 20 years jail and anyone using a weapon in a crime or with intention to crime should be jailed for life.

That is all the protection a civilised society needs. I dont need noobs like u tc708mm with your personal armoury defending my society as you believe you are. Just unarmed civilians living in a society with tough laws and the right people in law enforcement and military armed.

Domestic Rambo's you always have an excuse for yourselves.

reply

do you seriously think that by restricting gun ownership you will reduce the number of firearms in criminals possesion? if it were not for average citizens owning weapons with which to defend themselves crime rates would be much higher than they are today. if you think i am of my rocker, go look at australia. they banned most private possesion of firearms, with the affect of violent crime skyrocketing.

in my humble opinion, if you really feel that you have no need for any protection beyond what the police or military can provide, i sincerely pray i can be there on that night when you get mugged in a dark alley. criminals won't disarm, and you should think twice before you think to take away us decent folks only REAL protection.

reply

Vaderlives2001 - i can see your point but;

As an Australian I can say that violent crime in Australia is not widespread but is limited to certain ethnic enclaves full of people who our Government allows in though they come from countries with conflicting cultures, lifestyles and opinions to that of their newly adopted culture (my oil and water theory). These urban ghetto's spawn localised gangs of knife wielding hoods who generally stay local though the crime in them is hugely disproportionate to the nations average.

Australia in short is a much different society to the US or Europe.

But deciding who is a good person to own a gun is a risky issue. I might be good today and go ape next year. But hey - its a bit late if my G36 has arrived in the Christmas stocking for your family. Yes you might get the first shot off, you might not - as i could wait for you to leave for work.

i just think the human mind, depression, family break ups, job losses - financial desperation, social isolation, alienation etc are all major major issues that can turn someone silly - so being a good gun owner is never a sure guarantee someone, someday wont just lose the plot.

reply

[deleted]

"There is no civilian-legal, semi-auto G-36 available in America"

I purchased a G36 45 cal. two days ago from my local gun shop

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Vaderlives2001 - i can see your point but;

As an Australian I can say that violent crime in Australia is not widespread but is limited to certain ethnic enclaves full of people who our Government allows in though they come from countries with conflicting cultures, lifestyles and opinions to that of their newly adopted culture (my oil and water theory). These urban ghetto's spawn localised gangs of knife wielding hoods who generally stay local though the crime in them is hugely disproportionate to the nations average.

Australia in short is a much different society to the US or Europe.

Recognizing that I'm six years late to the thread, barring some limited differences, you've described the violent crime problem in the US. Not much different at all in my opinion. Exactly why there's no need to deprive honest law abiding citizens access to firearms.



"Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye." 2001: A Space Odyssey

reply


I own a Glock and I carried an M9 Beretta for 5 years. I wouldn't knock either one of them. But I doubt the military would start carrying Glocks. They appreciate carrying weapons in "Condition 1", basically ready to fire with safety on. I don't even know why police do it. I love the Glock, but I can't see it as a standard-issue law enforcement weapon. The lack of safety switch, and necessity to continuously carry a weapon with a round chambered seems to create more danger than necessary. I was just reading a recent gun magazine that was listing off various incidents that have already occured where a criminal grabbed a cop's Glock and immediately began shooting. The article juxtaposed this data with events where criminals grabbed a cop's gun (with a safety switch) and the criminal was not quick enough or adept enough to get the safety off with the few seconds they had.

Personally, I love the M9's safety. I can draw and fire immediately, flipping off the safety while drawing. I would never carry a Glock cocked unless I was planning on shooting.

reply

H&K is the first firearms producer to offer a commercial product with a polymer frame.... more than a decade ahead of Glock. Tell your fiction someplace else.

reply

I don't believe Gerard. I highly doubt you can shoot a Glock underwater, or with sand in it.

reply

[deleted]

You learn something new everyday. I didn't know that. Thanks.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]