She was so unattractive in this film, it makes you think that there's no way she could have a boyfriend! Bad haircut (I mean, come on, she do has a big nose and this kind of haircut shows it off in the worst possible way), ugly clothes and shoes... all in all, a disaster!
But as the philosopher Jagger once said, "You can't always get what you want".share
But if you try sometimes, you get what you need.
NO ONE WILL BE WATCHING US WHY DON'T WE DO IT IN THE ROAD?
Yes, her haircut was despicable. And, THANK YOU for mentioning her huge proboscus. No one ever seens to mention her hideously huge nose.
I DID like her double-breasted, 3/4 brown velveteen/suede coat with fur collar and lining.
Really? I like her hair in this movie better than in any other. This was also the movie I thought she was most beautiful in, and I'm not even a fan of hers. Different strokes, I guess...
shareShe is unattractive and not a decent actress.
shareWarts as well.
shareI noticed those too...glad I wasn't watching it on Blu-Ray! She prob. won't watch this film...
Esp. the one over her eye by her eyebrow...
The hair-do was questionable in this film -- sloppy cut, bad color job. That being said, I think Paltrow is a very attractive woman and a good actress.
shareYeah. But she's a better actress and more attractive than Jennifer Aniston.
shareWhat a bunch of little twats.
You really think so? I found her gorgeous in this film...especially with her hair.
share