Shame it's sequel couldn't made it

Food for thought, I guess.

You know nothing about Godzilla. Electricity really? No wonder you like that 98 abomination of a film.

Not sure why, if you and I will remember it that it'll be forgotten. Some..perhaps many will continue to be intrigued by its novelty for years to come.

~Oh Lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz.~

rizdek is right. I thought this movie was very enjoyable. Great effects and just enough humor. I personally won't forget it.

The reboot is very good film, its the proper direction for a Godzilla film. You expected a generic action monster movie with 90% of Godzilla and 10% of story like the 1998 film.

Dont get it twisted I enjoy the 1998 film, it is what it is but the 2014 is the better movie.

[deleted]

What Godzilla 1998's Trilogy Would've Looked Like (& Why It Didn't Happen)

https://screenrant.com/godzilla-1998-movie-sequel-trilogy-story-plans-canceled/

Godzilla's reputation with fans and critics may suggest that Godzilla was an all-around disaster, but this was actually not the case. Despite all the negative reviews, Godzilla was a box office success at $379 million. That's only slightly less than Godzilla: King of the Monsters' worldwide box office gross of $386 million. It easily made enough to justify a sequel, but their plans for Godzilla 2 were complicated by other matters, such as the reception to the film. An abundance of negative reviews had the studio concerned that a sequel wouldn't be as profitable as the first movie. Emmerich and Devlin were expected to be involved in Godzilla 2, but both ultimately dropped out of the project over budget issues. With the negative reception, it's likely the studio wasn't willing to increase costs for the sequel given that the chances of one outperforming the first movie were low.