The Mummy (1932)


Anyone here see this version with Boris Karloff as Imhotep?

reply

I grew up with the Universal classics, but save for the admittedly skin-crawling opener, the Karloff version of The Mummy is about as dry as a sand sundae.

I love the old-school swashbuckler meets summer blockbuster formula of the remake.

http://jmoneyyourhoney.filmaf.com/owned

reply

I agree. I am a huge lover of classic horror films, especially Universal and Hammer, but Karloff's Mummy (apart from his performance) is a dry, tedious film on all accounts, sharing many problems with Dracula.

reply

It's still better than Dracula by a mile:

the romantic leads at least have some dignity , as opposed to Helen Chandler's "Crying Baby in an adult's body" Mina and David Manner's "Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina! Mina!" Harker.

How you can make the world a better place:
Don't shop at Wal-Mart.

reply

I love when Harker repeatedly yells Mina, Mina. It shows just how much he loves her

reply

It's actually my favorite of the Universal Monsters. I like this version too though.

The 1932 version is just plain creepy.

Conquer your fear, and I promise you, you will conquer death.

reply

The 1932 Mummy movie was a classic. It set the standard for all the movies that came afterward. Fortunately, the Frasier/Weisz version was one of the best.

Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!

reply

hear, hear. well i hadn't seen this since i was a kid and forgot what daring scenes it has, it implied suitable for all ages and sort of comedy like, not like the 1930s one starring boris karloff. the titles are rolling five minutes into the movie. strange watching the hanging part then become jolly company and acting different with environment, i don't think i ever saw the sequels as kid. check out the weird done grow led into the camera. this has strayed pretty far from the 1930s movie story, messy, special effects, and doesn't have the mystique, and unlike other mummy versions i've seen this includes humour, we can't have that 😠 . i wonder why the little guy didn't run before the mummy made him his slave. you never see any grotesque scenes, this was obviously suited for a wide range of age groups, never checked out the sequels, as this aired again i had planned to watch it but found it so grotesque it put me off. my favorite version remains karloff's from the 1930s. so what's the title of these mummy movies in england?



😺 🐫 ☀️ 🦞




dont need solar energy,
close to your high voltage steam beam,
technology seem frail and pointless,
as youre a natural livin special effect,
no other creation comes close in reach,
and your solar energy is too much for me.

reply

It also starred John Mellion

reply