MovieChat Forums > Titanic (1997) Discussion > How was this not rated R?

How was this not rated R?


Watching the movie tonight for the first time in a few years. How did this movie get just a PG-13 rating with the nude scene, language, giving the finger, and all the violence during the sinking?

reply

By today's standards, it probably would be rated R. Smh

reply

The nudity was just a topless scene and it had nothing to do with sex. The violence was pretty much bloodless so no need for it to be rated R.

reply

We see her ass as well!

reply

Yes but again that scene was Rose posing for her drawing and it had nothing to do with sex.

reply

Brief non-sexual nudity is permitted in PG-13 (PG before they created PG 13) movies board. Same as Doc Hollywood.

reply

It wasn't violent or gory enough, and the sex was very tame, with hardly any of it shown on screen. That, and there was only one topless scene.

reply

How many PG-13 movies have this level of topless?

reply

You'd be surprised. Heck, the only reason "Stardust" wasn't rated R was because they gave the prince who got his throat slashed fake blue blood in one scene!

reply

LOL, you should see some of the PG movies from the 1970s and 1980s if you think this should have been rated R.

reply

You're right. It should have been rated R for Retarded!

reply

I think the historical backdrop gave the film some leeway. The film is based on a real-life tragedy, something that really happened. The MPAA felt the nudity, language, violence etc was a little educational and, therefore, appropriate for some children.

reply

Did we even see Rose's boobs? Or did we just get a shot of her naked back, and a pencil drawing of her front?

Straight men! Make yourselves useful here!

reply

We see her boobs when she lies on the couch. We see her ass too.

reply

Her tits were out.

reply

it was tasteful nudity. was not like she was flopping her boobs about like a girls gone wild video

reply