Anyway, I don't think the "Starship Troopers" novel was satirical at all.
I'm inclined to agree. There's too much research and painstaking effort to create a setting consistent with itself to even the tiniest detail. Satire on the other hand depends on hyperboles and embellishment, it
forces the audience to come to a certain conclusion, much like an allegory. Satirizing propaganda is kind of ironic, for after all, satire IS propaganda. I'm sure I don't need to remind anyone of the instrumental part Aristophanes played in the travesty of justice against Socrates.
They're enjoyable as novels, but if you look at them as presenting ideological arguments, they're somewhat immature and childish.
Heinlein does not present arguments for or against any silly ideology. He
creates ideas. Much like haute couture, his constructs are not meant to be "worn", but to capture the paragon form of cultural aspects not yet clearly defined, and introduce them into the reader's mind. In this practice I would say he is as masterful as they come. I am actually dumbfounded to hear somebody enjoyed reading Heinlein. In my experience he's as fun to read as pulling teeth. Which is no surprise; every birth is bloody and torturous.
reply
share