Why did they cut off the sequel rules?
They filmed them, they were in the trailer.
But in the actual film Dewey interrupts Randy, so we are left with incomplete rules
What's the reasoning behind that?
They filmed them, they were in the trailer.
But in the actual film Dewey interrupts Randy, so we are left with incomplete rules
What's the reasoning behind that?
I think the third rule in the trailer was actually nonsense and only made for the trailer. It doesn't even make sense, "If you want your sequel to become a franchise, never, ever, under any circumstances assume the killer is dead"??? What, so the writer of a horror movie sequel shouldn't assume the killer he's created is dead??? The fact that Randy was cut off in the movie is a joke. He's about to explain the secret to having a succesful movie franchise and we'll never get to hear it. There was never any third rule, because nobody knows it.
shareIf the filmmakers wanted to continue a franchise, top billed or not, then the third rule makes absolute sense. Randy's death will go down as one of the most heartfelt murders in slasher history. You may not have liked it, but you felt it. Also, stop talking like you spew pure fact.
"Oh... I'm not afraid."
-Pamela Voorhees
Well, it seems I've got my very own stalker!
If the filmmakers wanted to continue a franchise, top billed or not, then the third rule makes absolute sense.
Also, stop talking like you spew pure fact.
Huh? That's not what he says, though. That's not the third rule, you're tacking on the part about being a franchise and then using that as reasoning to cut the rule.
shareIt's a shame I never read your comment back on IMDb.
You're wrong about the third rule as seen in the trailer being cut off in the movie. In the movie Randy definitely says, "If you want your sequel to become a franchise, never, ever, under any circumstances ..." before being cut off. So the third rule in the trailer is an entirely different take than the one in the movie
Also, my reasoning to cut the rule is NOT because it's a franchise. It's about whose perspective these rules are from. Not sure why you were so confused.
You know, I don't actually see the third rule in any of the trailers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqOp7pnhQAo
I remember hearing it as a kid, and I've used it on forums, but I wonder if it's one of those things you thought you heard and then it kinda snowballed with other people thinking they heard it too.
Arya vs T-1000: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFaSNe691h0
I was thinking the same thing, Brad. People keep mentioning it, and I keep searching for it, but I've never actually seen it anywhere. If the trailer does exist, I would be very interested in seeing it!
shareHere it is:
https://youtu.be/aERt0FJ7URE
In case it was missed.
shareThank you! Glad I didn't hallucinate it.
---
Hey, I never got an email notification, but thanks for the link! So weird, that third rule makes no sense at all, it must've been intended only for the trailer.
shareIt seems like a reference to the "One less scare" trend Scream likes to do.
In terms of horror franchises as a whole, it also makes sense (dead killer = no sequels)
I think it's more a reference to how unstoppable killers become in the sequels. Namely Jason and Michael.
---
Not definitely killing off your killer makes sense (even though they always find ways to bring them back). But for a moviemaker to "never assume the killer is dead" doesn't make sense. That rather seems to be the perspective of the audience or the characters in the movie.
share