MovieChat Forums > Mortal Kombat: Annihilation (1997) Discussion > So-bad-it's-good, and better then the 1s...

So-bad-it's-good, and better then the 1st one...

posted 10 years ago by neshastrah
3 replies | jump to latest

For me, anyway.

MK Annihilation had a horrible script, bad acting, but effort is much more appreciated in this one. At least they tried, to gave it that video game feeling, with characters, moves, battles, places, costumes were wonderfully done. Fights were much better in the 2nd one, faster and better choreographed.

But then again, lots of characters were waisted, I must say that.

What I must say is that Chris Lambert was HORRIBLE Raiden in the 1st one, every time he spoke, I expected for people to get naked and have sex, almost like I'm watching porn. Every actor except Robin Shou and Linden Ashby did a terrible job at that one.

James Remar was better Raiden for me. And I will always appreciate "heart in the right place" crap, more then mild effort and slow-mo lazy fights in the 1st one.

[–] Thenewnexus 10 years ago

I prefer the ist one,but this movie is not as bad as people say

You want tah fack wit me? You ah fACKING chioah boi compahed tu me ah chioah boi

[–] mountaindewslave 8 years ago

you're nuts

Raiden at least is taken somewhat seriously in the first movie, in the second he's a joke. whole film is schlock, terrible looking and terrible dialogue

she fell through a hole, and was never seen again

[–] IrinaOma 8 years ago

Sorry but the original is 100x better but I agree with the fights. This sequel is much stronger in this category