why only 5.6?
why only 5.6?
shareThe movie is completely formulaic. Every single scene is predictable. And it could hardly be otherwise, since obviously the writer had in mind "I'm going to write a movie challenging the belief that men are physically more capable than women." Once that's established, it's paint by numbers. It's worth about a 3-4.
It should be against the law to use "LOL" unless you really did LOL!
Hmmmm, while not a "great" movie, I actually thought it was quite good. I thought it was very believable. To watch athletic events these days, where someone like Serena Williams is serving the ball as fast as Rafael Nadal, or to watch any of a number of women compete at levels that were unimaginable years ago, makes this movie pass the credibility test. I gave it an 8.
shareBecause cliche filled and predictable. It's mostly boring as not much exciting or amazing stuff happens. It's an "okay" movie.
shareThere. I just gave it a 7 and raised if to a 5.8.
share