MovieChat Forums > Just Shoot Me! (1997) Discussion > COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!


Just to exemplify:

http://i.imgur.com/YQIsb.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/gynyr.jpg

Don't get me wrong. These're decent looking girls. But come on! On the cover of a vogue-esque fashion magazine? Which we have to stare a couple times during an episode?? Seriously, what were they thinking? Why were some of the cover girls really gorgeous and some of them are like.. u know..

reply

Oh please. It's a show about the people who work for the fashion magazine not the people on the magazine. They weren't going to waste their budget to pay high end models to pose for a fake cover shot.

reply

How much money does it take to get an easy-on-the-eyes girl if not hot? Even the cheapest porn sites get better girls. And this situation was almost exclusive to season 4 for some reason. It just got back to normal in season 5 again, girls were again ok to appear on a fashion magazine. So I was wondering if they were trying to make some sort of statement or something, cause money excuse is kinda ridiculous

reply

Fiction. On TV. Who. Really Cares.

Wait. You do. And probably the only one.

reply

awful attempt at trolling

reply

Because beauty is in the eye of the beholder. They look fine to me.

http://mo3del.ru/files/pic_models/spoilers.jpg

reply

Uh these girls are just as good looking as the cover models real magazines use who can actually be quite peculiar looking, I mean does anyone really think Kate Moss is the least bit attractive?

BTW Isn't that Uma Thurman in that first photo?

reply

Uma? God NO! lol

reply

Young Kate Moss was attractive.

https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=kate+moss&client=firefox-a&h s=6Ho&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=sb&source=lnm s&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=iiceU675F43jkAWO8ICwAQ&ved=0CAkQ_AU oAQ&biw=1280&bih=706#channel=sb&q=kate+moss+young&rls= org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbm=isch&facrc=_&imgdii=_&i mgrc=_sTwl7csbdzVoM%253A%3BsVziYRPRHGhdhM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fnews.bb c.co.uk%252Fnol%252Fshared%252Fspl%252Fhi%252Fpop_ups%252F05%252Fmagaz ine_kate_moss_through_the_years%252Fimg%252F1.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252 Fnews.bbc.co.uk%252F2%252Fshared%252Fspl%252Fhi%252Fpop_ups%252F05%252 Fmagazine_kate_moss_through_the_years%252Fhtml%252F1.stm%3B300%3B300

reply


quasi, I think those two are the same woman.

I guess it's like looking at clouds. You see one thing and I see another. Peace.

reply

i really dont think so :)

reply

you make a great point, details count.

reply

They're pretty enough but I wish they didn't have that "I just rolled out of bed" hair {was that the fad in those years}. The striped was pretty plain too.

reply

I think that Blush was supposed to be a Cosmo-type rather than a Vogue-esque magazine and the covers reflected that.

reply