Lack of blood
No blood squids?
Well if there were you couldn't see the effect either because of the rubbish brown sepia effect of the film or not much red juice packed in the squids.
There was a lot of blood in every single shoot out. You either need glasses or a bigger TV.
One should judge a man mainly from his depravities.Virtues can be faked.Depravities are real.Kinski
from what i remember the bullet hits had alot more smoke and chucks of stuff (flesh,clothe?) flying out rather than blood. still a very violent film even though lacking excessive blood.
shareWell, sure, lacking "excessive blood", but that's not exactly what this movie is about (although, given it's cheesy atmosphere and imitation of the chinese shoot-em-up's - like "Hard Boiled" or "The Killer" the excess blood wouldn't have been out of place) it is still a solid movie given it's objective. I would not rate it any lower than a seven. Bruce Willis sells this movie big time.
If you disagree with me and think I'm a total ass_hole, then why are you reading my signature?
i think you mean 'squibs'.
shareFor what it's worth, after the so-called "gunfight at the O.K. Corral," at least one eye-witness who viewed the freshly dead bodies in the vacant lot where the fight really took place commented on the lack of blood. On the other hand, after the famous fight in the Graham-Tewksbury war, in which Sheriff Commodore Perry Owens, firing a Winchester from the hip, fatally wounded four gunmen with as many shots, a contemporary newspaper account comments on "thick, ropy" pools of blood all over the scene. I guess some people are bleeders and others aren't. I also imagine it depends where the bullet hits, and that often the serious bleeding doesn't commence immediately unless the bullet punctures a big vein or artery or something.
shareYou can bleed more if your still alive rather then dead.
share