1 - 1/12 She's cranky when she has a case in the early morning hours 2 - she's partial to people who have dogs that have been attacked by other dogs, like pitbulls (she does not like pitbulls) 3 - she doesn't like cases of "live-in" relationships
You can earn all the child support needed for three children by collecting soda cans.
When Judge Judy asks a litigant whether they have been committed to a mental institution or if they are on psychotropic drugs, and they answer no, she will believe them.
There are other ways of entertaining yourself other than "making babies", but really, can going to a flower show really be more fun than having wild sex?
Don't interrupt! Litigants who constantly say "that's a lie", "that's not true", shake their head and make gestures, etc....this shows that they can't control themselves. And if they can't control themselves in court, imagine how bad they are on the outside.
<“Why, you stuck up, half-witted, scruffy-looking, Nerf-herder!” — Princess Leia to Han>
And your children don't like missing meals either, Grace. Maybe they'd like something homemade for a change, instead of stuff out of a box. But what can they expect, when you're boozing it up every single day? Didn't you just get your children back from CPS? Looks like they're going to be taken away again.
Just a heads-up to everyone. This poster, who now goes under the name of "Bookmanmovielover" and is pretending to be a man, is actually a woman named Grace who was kicked off IMDB two years ago for abusive behavior. It was revealed she abused her children, drank to excess, and put them in mortal danger of their lives by driving drunk with them actually STAND UP in the car. She barely missed hitting a telephone pole, and the police arrested her. It's been downhill from there ever since.
One of her pastimes is posting on message boards and pretending to be a man. Many times she'll mention a "wife" and "one daughter." As Grace, she had a husband who left her for another man and three children. And she was very religious, too, and hated God for turning his back on her. Nothing is as it seems on the IMDB.
reply share
There's a difference between being biased against men....and realizing that men and women are different and having slightly different expectations for them. JJ is not biased against men. But she expects men to work. She bristles when she hears that a woman is going out to work every day while the man is unemployed and stays home. She also realizes the dynamics of relationships. Bad men tend to cheat and sneak around like dogs. Bad women tend to be desperate and put the man above all common sense, even above her own children. So she rips men and women in different ways. Men for being arrogant dogs (hence the 'looks' thing). Women for being stupid and desperate. But they both get ripped equally. Just about different things. So I think you should quit whining about JJ picking on men. She only does that to those who deserve it.
She might test a guy though. Start ripping him a little to see how he reacts to it. It's an excellent tactic to see if he can control himself. But if the guy acts right and has sufficient answers, JJ will rule in his favor.
And yet she doesn't expect from women to work and have no problem if man is the only one in the family who's working.
Newsflash JJ (and jmichael3387) - it ain't 1952 anymore.
Yes, she does raise her eyebrows when she sees a young woman going out every day to work at a low-paying job, while her boyfriend is unemployed and loafing around the house all day. She gives a little more leeway to a stay-at-home mom who's husband is working. But it's not because JJ is biased against men. It's because most of the time, in her experience, it turns out that the stay-at-home man is simply lazy and irresponsible.
reply share
Yes, she does raise her eyebrows when she sees a young woman going out every day to work at a low-paying job, while her boyfriend is unemployed and loafing around the house all day. She gives a little more leeway to a stay-at-home mom who's husband is working.
You continue to ignore the point because it makes JJ look bad.
Nobody is talking about stay-at-home moms; we're talking about women with no kids who don't work for the simple reason that they don't want. Are you gonna tell me that JJ is equally tough on both men and women who are unemployed?
But it's not because JJ is biased against men.
Didn't you say that you could give us at least 100 examples where JJ was biased towards women? We're still waiting ...
It's because most of the time, in her experience, it turns out that the stay-at-home man is simply lazy and irresponsible.
And stay-at-home women are not? The only time when women don't work is because of kids; otherwise, they're always employed? Who are you kidding?
=== When I die, I want to be buried face down. That way whoever doesn't like me can kiss my ass.
reply share
FYI - Bookman has nothing to do with these posts. Sounds like Rod views him a hero and gives him way too much credit. Bookman is done with dealing with crazy Rod Labbe aka Scarymary, Tankitty, Naterdawg and so on. Bookman stopped commenting on Rod's crazy posts months ago. Look at his account if you don't believe me. All Bookman did was give me screenshots he saved and got from others.
Self proclaimed grieving failed writer Rod A. Labbe, who misses his mommy & kitty cat continues to sexually harass, stalk, insult & attacker users. After being asked to stop his childish disgusting ways he continues to spend all day on IMDB obsessing over users. More than one user has gone to the police due to his actions online. His publishers dropped him after he threw a fit on Facebook in 2015. Other publishers black balled him too.
As he continued to harass others for less than a weekend I changed my profile picture to his mommy's picture. He finally got a taste of his own medicine. He didn't like his loved ones being talked about online, he didn't like being stalked around IMDB. He cried "HER FAMILY SHOULD BE VERY CONCERNED." The poor weepy little man just couldn't take it but we have users here who continue to post despite his perverted attacks.
I posted the following after he whined about me talking about his mommy. He felt it was unfair. At the ripe rotting age of 64 he dissolved after he was stalked back. One sock account said "She thinks it's ok to stalk because she'd been stalked." He was wrong about who he was talking about but he is right. I'm stalking him back. He is getting what he has dished out.
This is where he, Rodney A Labbe hides in Salem, NH. It is his mommy's house and he's lived here since 1985. He moved home after graduating from college and never left. Wouldn't dear old mom be proud of her boy? https://postimg.org/image/71yiyrcvr/
Below just a small sample of his time spent here on IMDB. I directed this at him after he claimed it was unfair I used his mom's photo as my profile picture and used her first and middle name as my user name.
Posts photos of your privates on Twitter - (I won't post a link to his ugly small thing.)
Writes death stories about a user Writes death stories about a users children Writes death stories about being a woman with children - https://postimg.org/image/5offp0kjx/
More than one user went to the police because of YOU
I'd say Rod A Labbe being outed on here then had the tables turned on him was very well deserved.
As Rod A Labbe creates his lies he lied about me telling him to post the following quote. He seems to forget that users are capable of posting their own posts.
Trust me you pervert, EVERY ONE is so glad your playground is being taken away. YOU have hurt so many people here with your disgusting, perverted mind. I'm not going to respond to you or your socks. So reply all you want.
So many users are thankful he is now telling us where he is going. We will all make sure to avoid that website.
Just like you did this with your nutty posts this past week this message here can easily be reposted for all to see who you are and what you have done to others.
Last time I posted this you reminded me the message boards are being deleted. I don't need reminded but you do need to be reminded that IMDB isn't the only place online. This can easily be copy and pasted anywhere online.
Images are from Bookman, myself and other users. More images will be added. If any of you have your own which I know you do from what Bookman told me months ago just message me & I'll tell you where to upload them. I will edit out your user name & profile picture if requested.
12. If you are a small-business owner, you're automatically guilty of something.
13. If you are an obese female dressed inappropriately, JJ will say nothing derogatory to you. If you are an obese male, dressed inappropriately, JJ will rip you up one side and tear you down the other.
14. If you are a male, and have the top two or three buttons of your shirt unbuttoned, JJ will try her best to embarrass you. If you are a female, showing off as much cleavage and skin as possible, JJ won't bat an eye.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16
There are a lot of people that try to say JJ is biased against men. But it's not true.
For instance: Women's fashions are different than men's. Women's blouses and dresses tend to have low-cut necklines. Men's shirts do not. A man strutting into court with his shirt unbuttoned is not appropriate. Also....a skirt on a woman can be appropriate, whereas shorts on a man is not. It's not because JJ is biased. It's common sense.
For instance: Women's fashions are different than men's. Women's blouses and dresses tend to have low-cut necklines. Men's shirts do not. A man strutting into court with his shirt unbuttoned is not appropriate. Also....a skirt on a woman can be appropriate, whereas shorts on a man is not. It's not because JJ is biased. It's common sense.
It's called professional attire for both. What a woman wouldn't wear at a professional job, she shouldn't wear to court. So if she would wear a buttoned up blouse, jacket and pants or skirt to a professional job, it's what she should wear to JJ. If she's undecided or unclear about what to wear to court (or a professional job) she can always Google it.
Same with men.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16
It's called professional attire for both. What a woman wouldn't wear at a professional job, she shouldn't wear to court. So if she would wear a buttoned up blouse, jacket and pants or skirt to a professional job, it's what she should wear to JJ. If she's undecided or unclear about what to wear to court (or a professional job) she can always Google it.
Pvd, I agree with you here. And another point to be made is we men have nothing to do to make us look sexy. Women can wear dresses revealing their legs, they can wear low cut blouses, they can douse themselves in makeup and eyeliner. Men should get to be able to do some stuff as well.
reply share
15. If you are a young man, particularly if you are nice looking, Judy will despise you on sight and try to make a fool out of you, before you've had a chance to say one word.
15. If you are a young man, particularly if you are nice looking, Judy will despise you on sight and try to make a fool out of you, before you've had a chance to say one word.
So true. If you're really handsome and well-toned/muscled she will find you guilty before you even blink your eyes.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16
So true. If you're really handsome and well-toned/muscled she will find you guilty before you even blink your eyes.
I notice this too, but it's actually a great ratings tactic. Judge Judy knows the person getting yelled at the most will get the most camera time. If she is sitting there giving the ugly party all the attention, the camera won't be on the hot studs as much. And Pvd and myself included would be less entertained as gay men. I think JJ has a strong gay following so that wouldn't bode well for her ratings. So I say keep giving the hotties the business.
reply share
If you're an ex-girlfriend and her ex-boyfriend who previously lived together in court, you're going to get the business for not deciding to get married before living with that ex-partner so that you could go through all the hassles of divorce.
If your chest is red, you're lying and your case is dismissed.
If you take a drink of the delicious water we have served you and put in front of you, F YOU BEEEEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOOOOOTCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
Don't sue for a cell phone bill because you'll never win
If you're a woman who was taken advantage of by a man, he's a con man and you'll win your case. If you're a man taken advantage of by a woman, you're a fool and you'll lose your case.
DON'T THINK OF AN ANSWER YOU THINK I WILL BUY. SPEAK THE TRUTH.
drinking too much water in front of her gets her to ask you if you are diabetic...
10 minute cases require water pitchers.
she does not do affidavits.
but she does do letters written by 'children' -- especially with crayons and invented spellings-- particularly when the child in question is 12 years old!
Sny84....Judge Judy and I both agree with you that women shouldn't be able to just sit around the house collecting welfare. But if she has 3 or 4 kids, she has to take care of them. She's got to get child-support from the guy. If I made the rules....they wouldn't be getting taxpayer money. Put the kids up for adoption if you can't take care of them yourself.
But back to the main topic....what else have we learned from watching her show? We've learned that it's very important to dig into the background of the litigants. They sometimes try to say that their past or their criminal record has nothing to do with the case. But it does!!
If I made the rules....they wouldn't be getting taxpayer money. Put the kids up for adoption if you can't take care of them yourself.
One thing that I've learned not only from watching the show but also from reading threads on this board is that there is (understandably) an issue with people who collect welfare.
There's a popular misconception (stereotype) that the majority of people who collect welfare are lazy and don't want to work when they can get 'free' money. While that may be the case for some it's certainly not the case for all.
I used to work in a criminal justice system and there isn't anything that I haven't seen, including people who repeatedly take advantage of the system.
But, for every person who's taking advantage of the system there are more people who'd rather get paid for doing an honest day's work rather than have the government hand them a check. But some can't because they have no alternative. Some want to work but no one will give them a chance. Some are disabled and can't work. Some have to stay home and watch the kids because it's a one-parent household and the father can't or won't pay child support.
Below is an excerpt from an online article about public benefits published in 2011:
Gross misperceptions about who receives public benefits and for what purposes are leading the nation toward debates that distract from the real problems facing middle-class and low-income Americans. Most public benefits spending is for participants, largely senior citizens, who have paid for the services via a lifetime of work. This is far different from the picture painted by many conservatives of public benefits being for lazy poor people who do not want to work. These misperceptions put all public benefits programs at risk, including those that reach the middle class. They also derail benefits programs that specifically target people living in poverty and help them to join the middle class.
What are the chances that a former prisoner or a disabled person will get a job over someone who's recently graduated from college?
In fact, there are some college graduates who've no choice but to either go on public assistance or accept minimum wage jobs until they can find steady employment.
Everyone's situation is different. Not everyone is taking advantage of the system. We've had clients come in to the office crying because their pride wouldn't allow them to apply for public assistance and have eventually done so due to extreme necessity.
A mother who has 3 or 4 kids and is on public assistance has various reasons for being on public assistance. As taxpayers, we absolutely have a right to question why but as humans we could all be a little more compassionate because we don't know everyone's situation and we don't know for a fact that every single recipient of public assistance is doing so to scam the system.
I understand where you are coming from Mike but I teach in the south Bronx and many parents on welfare really are lazy. or they work under the table and collect dual money. and they have kid after kid after kid. which they have no idea how to feed, clothe, or raise. and then we have situations like Zeymere Perkins happen.
My favorite is when we see the community come together... they all are running into and out of an apartment carrying electronics... why? caseworker's coming!
caseworker can't see the humungous flat screen TVs [yeah, multiple] and other things like that... if they can afford that, then they don't need welfare!
Another dumb logic that JJ has is that only people with mental issues cause accidents intentionally and/or use situations to do an insurance scam.
Today there was a case where a plaintiff sued a defendant for the car accident. Defendant admitted that he left his kids in the car and that the car rolled, but denied that plaintiff's car was hit. JJ asked plaintiff if she was ever treated for any mental illness and/or if she's taking any mental health meds. When plaintiff answered "no", I guess that was enough for JJ to make a decision that the plaintiff was telling the truth. How do we know if the damage on the car wasn't there before?
There was a case from multiple years ago where a plaintiff claimed that the defendant hit her cars when he was shooting his gun. The defendant didn't deny that he was shooting his gun, but claimed that he lives in the country side and a lot of people shoot guns there. He claimed that he can prove that his bullets didn't cause the damage because bullet holes on the car had rust on them, meaning that they happened a longer time ago. JJ asked plaintiff the question about mental issues and then ruled in her favor (which yelling at defendant to be responsible with his weapons).
=== When I die, I want to be buried face down. That way whoever doesn't like me can kiss my ass.
Syn84, if ever you have a court case, just always remember to file it on a Tuesday or Thursday. Those will be JJ's less cranky days. And always be sure ask your local judge if your cases can be handled in the afternoon time after so that the judge has had his/her lunch so that he won't be not quite as cranky and rule in your favor.