MovieChat Forums > Die Hard with a Vengeance (1995) Discussion > Why Die Hard and Die Hard: With a Vengea...

Why Die Hard and Die Hard: With a Vengeance are the best


because they are by the same director. that's why.

reply

Those two are my favorite of the series. And McTiernan knowshow to stage an action scene

reply

Agreed, I actually watch this one more than the first. 2 is OK, but the new ones are just awful.

reply

Die Hard 2 has got better with age I feel (maybe the 2 recent installments have played a part in that) but it is still not in the same league as 1 and 3.

reply

I miss McTiernan, especially the McTiernan behind these classics.

Just look at that reverent shot of Bruce and Sam running with the twin towers in the background. He may have been referencing the 1993 attack but it almost feel like he was looking into the future.

reply

...Or maybe it was just a large and popular site.

reply

I couldn't help but laugh at that.

reply

McTiernan did a crap job with this one. The 2nd was a much better movie.

reply

I feel like DH's 1&3 are also the best because they do the best job of making McClane the reluctant hero (i.e. he's the only one to save the day), putting him against a villain who outclasses him and makes him trapped either within a building or a big city. We also spend time getting to see what McClane, the supporting cast and the villains are up to before any of the action starts.

While DH's 2&4 are fun, I don't feel like they have the balance down as well as the odd numbered installments.

reply