Did some critics look down at Clueless for having an aspirational, "we're hipper than everyone else" approach?
I a while back, listed to the TV Guidance Counselor podcast with Ken Reid. And in one episode, he interviewed Tim O'Donnell, who was the principal showrunner for the Clueless TV series with Rachel Blanchard as Cher that ran on ABC and later UPN from 1996-99.
https://tvguidancecounselor.libsyn.com/tv-guidance-counselor-episode-355-tim-odonnell
At the 01:05:50 mark, Reid compared the Clueless TV series under Tim O'Donnell as a sitcom variation of James at 15:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_at_15
Please note that I'm essentially, paraphrasing what O'Donnell said. But Amy Heckerling oversaw the series for the first handful of episodes. But she soon passed the show-running responsibilities onto O'Donnell because she came to the conclusion that the series was hurting her financially, given that her primary job was as a feature film director.
This is when O'Donnell said that continuing Heckerling's aspirational, "we're hipper than everyone else" approach couldn't work. In an episodic TV setting, you according to O'Donnell, actually need to "give a shit" about the characters.
https://moviechat.org/tt0115137/Clueless