What was wrong in adding nipples?

It's officially 'too far'. If bat-nipples are ok, how about a little bat-scrotum, or bat-cameltoe. It's just too much. Besides, there were no bat-veins, and if anything, they could have gotten away with veins but nipples showing through a male costume are not an artistic element I recall ever seeing in the comic books.

Also, only the guys had bat-nipples. Bat-girl didn't and it might have been kinda hot there. So it comes across as some more of Schumachers gay agenda... Bat-butt, bat-nipples, George Clooney. Seems like Schumacher made his movies with a raging hard-on the entire time.

Also, the six-packs looked so ridiculously fake. The whole thing had a cheesiness that reminds me of spray on tan.

I hadn't thought of the abs, but you're right. Why have one without the other?



"There will be blood. Oh, yes, there WILL be blood."-Jigsaw; "Saw II"

Having nipples and being anatomically correct made the suits look unusual, they were based on greek statues and superheroes are often drawn like painted semi naked people.

And it's a bit inappropriate to put them on since it was suppose to be a kid's film.

1. I never saw this movie as campy and wouldn't think of this as campy period.

2. If a crook gets aroused looking at the costume, that's THEIR kink. Since they would either be fighting Batman or running from him, I don't think they'd have time to notice nipples.

3. The Dynamic Duo have had gay rumors hurled their way for decades before the nippled suit. I'm not seeing this adding to them.

4. Some men can grow chest hair, some can't. Some shave it. Think of Batman as a "shaver". Again, with his constant movement, most people wouldn't be anle to take in that much detail.



"There will be blood. Oh, yes, there WILL be blood."-Jigsaw; "Saw II"

The Schumacher batsuits really seemed to show off the male anatomy and it made Batman look rather gay when he didn't need to be. Batman was never about homosexuality.

"I really wish Gia and Claire had became Tanner" - Honeybeefine