A couple excellent videos debunking the moon landing hoax

The SG Collins videos are a fine example of the TV/Film industry actually _not_ supporting the hoax theory. On top of that JW's rebuttal contains so many errors that it can't be taken seriously. Whether these are deliberate or not is open to debate, but considering the book "Live TV From the Moon" has been available since 2010 (and which clearly and methodically explains how the TV functioned on the Apollo missions), the is no excuse for sloppy research.

The claim that TV industry pros would not be able to tell the difference between a TV video source, 16mm and kinescoped footage is ridiculous to say the least. Those of us who earn a living by the day-to-day use of such formats had better know the difference between them, lest we wind up at the social services office claiming unemployment benefits.

JW's allegations that SG can't possibly know of the technology because he started in the industry in the 1980's is a logic that I cannot follow. Perhaps, JW has no idea about Apollo because he was born (according to his YT profile) AFTER the Apollo missions. He then has the nerve to suggest SG's logic is flawed!

To those who have actually properly researched the TV tech of Apollo, it is blatantly obvious that JW has NOT. Glaring mistakes which can be easily correlated and cross referenced highlight the glossed over method of investigation JW continues to use.

I am the author of "Live TV From the Moon" and "Live TV From Orbit". I have actually used the technology from Apollo and can verify it works as advertised. The fact that I also started in TV in the mid 1980's should hopefully not exclude me from understanding how that equipment functioned.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

No need to debunk idiocy from idiots.


================

4) You ever seen Superman $#$# his pants? Case closed.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

50 years from now when the rovers and descent stages are finally returned to Earth and put in a museum, there will be a plaque describing the heroism and fortitude of all those involved from the early stages of engineering to the brave men that rode these crude and dangerous machines to the moon and back.

People seeing these artifacts will laugh at fools like Jarrah White who, with zero astrophysics or engineering knowledge, came up with crack-pot theories that are so easily and completely defeated with science.

Only issue I have is SG Collins opinion that the money spent on the Apollo missions was a waste.

Collins is an old school hippy who believes that money should be spent on the "poor" instead of space, military, police, etc., never realizing that the more money you spend on the poor, the more poor you create, but that's for another debate. He only responded to White's ignorant theories about the photography and video images, something Collins knows about and White doesn't.

But the money spent on space is not one directional. Many inventions and scientific discoveries have come from space (and yes, even military spending) that improves *everyone's* way of life, including the poor. Many medical advances have come from experiments conducted on spacecraft.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

Some interesting thoughts in the Apollo 13 section of the " Explained by the Billy Meier Contacts:
Mysteries, Myths, Legends, Conspiracy Theories, Historical Inaccuracies & More" page.

https://theyflyblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/explained-by-the-billy-meier-contacts.pdf

reply share

add reply

formatting help

The hoax doesn't rate debunking. It's so ludicrous it induces laughter from rational people the first time they hear it. As for the others, facts don't make a dent in their thick skulls.

reply share

add reply

formatting help