Cars in 2004
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
shareYes their rather brave attempt at guessing at what cars might look like in 2004 was certainly turned out to be embarrassingly off the mark, LOL.
shareMovies are stylised. I don't think they thought cars would become that. I do like the idea of self driving cars though.
shareWell, I just watched 'Demolition Man' for the first time in years. Afterwards, I started to think about how various other movies from the later half of the 20th century (including Timecop) had depicted what cars might be like in the first part of the 21st century. The funny thing is absolutely no one predicted that half the population would be driving chunky 4WDs and SUVs.
shareAre you Australian?
What Australians call 4WD, Americans call SUVs.
What Australians call SUVs, Americans call Crossovers.
I see I gave myself away. Good guess (I am Australian). So when I said SUVs, I guess I was kind of thinking of the American definition, which as you say, seems to be what we Australians call Four Wheel Drives (4WDs). I think these are probably still a little more numerous than crossovers.
shareThey were just a tad off
sharenobody should have approved those designs for the film
shareWhen they are setting a movie only 10 years in the future like they did with Timecop, I don't see why they don't just use new cars (1994 models in this case). 10-year-old cars still being on the road is not at all uncommon. In fact, the current average age of cars on the road in the US is 12½ years old. It would be more believable for a cop to have a 10-year-old car than the latest hypothetical gee-whiz self-driving car too. For wealthy characters who wouldn't likely be driving or riding in an average 10-year-old car, just use a pristine classic car for them, many of which have more cachet than any new car anyway.
The idea of "futuristic" guns in the near future is dumb too. In 1994 fundamental gun technology hadn't changed in nearly a century, so why would they expect a big leap in the next 10 years? Even today, 20 years after the then-future (2004) setting of Timecop, fundamental gun technology still hasn't changed. There are just a lot more makes/models that are made largely of cheap plastic (à la Glock).
It's funny how the film got a few things right - like the widescreen TV that Van Damme has at home, though of course it's still CRT and has convex glass on the front, plus analog static. It also foreshadows "smart" homes with a disembodied voice that you can interact with just like those Google systems at home, coupled with home security systems. It also has VR pron, which would come a decade or two later.
Where the movie is way off is with the futuristic gun technology (though nicely not laser-beams, but more like caseless bullets) and the cars... not to mention the time travel of course. The attempts at futuristic fashion are funny too, like Van Damme's son wearing a multi-colored tie a the end, and the henchmen wearing baggy suits and samurai clothes.