Denouement...


Doubtless this has been brought up before ... I think many of the changes in the film version work well: e.g. Andy's ongoing conspiracy with a single warden; his ability to squirrel cash away seems more authentic than just relying on accounts made long ago by a friend who has since passed, etc.

In the novella (& it stands to reason that a post entitled "denouement" will contain spoilers) Red is finally paroled knowing only about the rock Andy's friend used to hide the safety deposit key & its approximate location. Andy never suggests he follow, seek out the rock, or join him in Mexico.

As Red begins to consider committing a minor crime in order to return to prison, he starts seeking out the rock instead. Not for any particular reason, except perhaps to verify that Andy really got away. When he finds it, Andy's note, invitation & traveling money are a complete surprise.

And so much more satisfying, I thought. After all, Red left prison still in prison, as it were. Andy's escape & thoughtfulness liberated not just himself, but Red, too.

When Andy tells Red to look him up well before his escape it reduces all of the tension & surprise.

Of course that's just me. I liked King's ending to The Mist much better than the film's.

reply

When you are close friends with someone and spend years together... wouldn't it be more realistic for you to discuss that plan rather than secretly hope your friend accidentally stumbles upon it? The only way I could see the other set up working is if you were unsure of someone and you wanted to test them... like tell them under the rock is a message you want hand delivered to a former lover, and you need him to take care of it... and then when they go to help you, they find the money and invitation instead. But when you already trust someone, there is no need to be mysterious or opaque about it... especially when you consider what happened to the old man who hung himself.

reply

Those are valid points, sure enough. Though it's been a few years, I think in the novella the relationship between Andy & Red isn't exactly friendship, rather one of mutual respect. Also, it wasn't at all clear to Andy that Red would ever get paroled in the first place. His leaving the letter & money was a longshot of the highest order.

I guess what I thought missing from the film is the suspense created when Red finally is paroled. Clearly he's not adjusting to the life set out for him, & finds himself on the verge of committing some petty crime in order to get sent back. When he goes looking for the stone, it's as much of a Hail Mary shot as Andy leaving the note & the money. Although the reader's not entirely surprised when Red finds the note & money, he's more gratified, I believe, then in Red simply leaving prison with a plan to join Andy in Mexico.

Of course, the screenplay shifts the suspense from is the rock real & will Red find it, to will Red get parole in the first place. If memory serves, Red's parole in the novella came about matter of fact, in due course.

reply

I think they cover this ground with Brooks character... the difficulty of the transition... so it would be redundant to go through it again with Red. Thanks for the explanation about the novella... I did not know that info.

reply

I don't know you, you denouement...

reply

I am filled with ennui by your use of the word denouement. This just doesn't seem like the right milieu for it.

reply

LOL. Reminds me of the scene in Pirates of the Caribbean when Elizabeth is asking Captain Barbosa for a truce. Barbosa acts like he's uneducated but then give it right back. Great dialog:

Elizabeth: Captain Barbossa, I am here to negotiate the cessation of hostilities against Port Royal.
Barbossa: There are a lot of long words in there, Miss; we're naught but humble pirates. What is it that you want?
Elizabeth: I want you to leave and never come back.
Barbossa: I'm disinclined to acquiesce to your request.....(observes the stunned look on her face)...Means "no".


reply