why did Victor had to stich body parts together for a Frankenstein?
Can't he just use a dead corpse n electrocute it to life?
instead of using various body parts n joining them together.
Can't he just use a dead corpse n electrocute it to life?
instead of using various body parts n joining them together.
He had to replace damaged/rotten parts.
shareThe book isn't very explicit in how or what he does to bring the creature to life, but it's heavily implied if not explicitly stated that he did use various body parts from various bodies. It's not known if he harnessed lightning to give the creature life, though it does take place on a "dreary night," so who knows? I think Shelley was purposefully vague in that matter.
shareI've read that it is said that the book doesn't state that electricity was used, but it kinda does. The aspects of electricity are involved in the early stages of the book and Galvinisation is mentioned many times in the book and the movie includes a scene that isn't in the book but explains what this means. The scene with the toad/frog is how the term came about as the experiment (done by some scientist called Galvin or something similar) ran electricity across the body of dead frogs and noted that the body seemed animated. Obviously we know now that muscles work on electric impulse as that is the reason for the twitching, but back then they believed that electricity was "fluid" that ran through the body.
Ok the words that electricity was used were never explicitly stated, but it is clear that electricity was used, and would have been obvious in the age it was written with the references given.
Shelley based Frankenstein's experiments in the book on actual work done by four men--Giuseppe Aldini, Luigi Galvani, Konrad Dipple, and Andrew Ure. All of them used electricity to stimulate parts of dead bodies, and at least two of them openly expressed a desire to reanimate a corpse using electricity. Electricity was also in vogue at the time as a newly harnessed means of energy--this being the Industrial Age in the wake of Benjamin Franklin's famous kite experiment--so it's probably very likely Shelley had electricity in mind as Frankenstein's means of creating the Monster.
Carthago delenda est.
I think in the book he says something like, "As the minuteness of the parts made a great hindrance to my speed, I resolved to create a creature of enormous stature."
No, that's not a direct quote, but close to what was written. I'm guessing his rationale was that a bigger body would be easier to animate?
It means that the larger the body is the less fiddly the job would be. It's easier to make something on a large scale than on a small one. For example, painting tiny little toy soldiers only about an inch in height, in detail, would be much harder than painting a toy soldier that was 12" high.
This also raises the question of why Branagh chose to cast the 5ft 9ins De Niro in a part that is described in the book as closer to 7ft tall.
I've read and reread the book and why Victor creates a new human instead of simply resurrecting a corpse is not directly dealt with.
If one reads between the lines it looks like it's simple ego. Victor now sees himself as God and wants to create a new lifeform.
Josh
Well, the creature's original base consisted of the man who was hanged for stabbing Waldman. In the scenes where the man appears, he has several mutilations; he is missing his left eye, his right leg, and it looks like he has several growths on the lower right part of his face. All of these needed to be replaced in order to create Victor's creature in the image he wanted it, which explains the numerous stitches on its face. He gave the creature Waldman's brain and used parts from a plague victim in order to compensate for rotten/malformed/missing parts.
"Just because you ARE a character, doesn't mean you HAVE character."
-Winston Wolf
Originally, I thought he wanted to get the best parts he could find
to make the best creation, which is why in the book he is so big
but in the movie
He seems to take what he can get, but you have to take into consideration
you cant take a leg from a 6'2 person and a leg from a 5'8 person and
expect it to work, so I think thats the reason
and the whole point was this was suppose to be the original organ transplants
cause the guy was like "if your heart goes bad, you can get another" and then
the other guy replied "It cant be done" So I also think he wanted as many "pieces"
as he could
"Dark Matters " did a show on one of those mentioned Scientist.
He had a human zapped with electricity and He moved around while
being charged . It freaked and scared one of the doctors watching
it He died that night.
He could of gotten a recent fresh corpse but it could have Internal
injuries and broken bones . He fed the parts with IV type fliuds
to keep from rotting .And He did not put the parts on ice like
the Hammer frankenstiens to preserve it.
Like in the Karloff version Frankenstein said this Person He built
never was . Built by his own hands .
Victor did not simply want to bring a human back to life. That was not enough for him. As he said to Henry he was dreaming of making a creature that would be "more civilized than us, more intelligent than us, better than us".
share[deleted]
I could forgive the bits and pieces of the first monster, but for Victor's bride to have huge gashes and stitches in her head/face and hand didn't really make much sense. He took Elizabeth's head and put it on Justine's body, makes sense as the monster ripped out Elizabeth's heart so he couldn't use her whole body, and Justine's body was otherwise unmarred, but why the hand? And if he cut off Elizabeth's head, why did she have huge scars on her face? I suppose it wouldn't be very interesting if his creation was 'beautiful'.
You don't choose the soy sauce, the soy sauce chooses you.
[deleted]