Time to be overly critical!

7. The whole films seems to be "against" horror in any fashion. I understand that it's a lighthearted little movie intended to give children the idea that the outside world is chock full of rainbows and lollipops and rainbows that dispense lollipops when hugged properly, but COME ON! Saying there's something "wrong" with a person because they want to be scared. Didn't Steven Spielberg have something to do with this? And correct me if I'm mistaken, but isn't this the same person who gave us Jaws and Jurassic Park. Yeah, Jurassic Park, remember the movie where the only wishes the dinosaurs fulfilled were death wishes and the only glee anyone ever had was when Newman got viscous dinosaur puke shot at his naked eyeballs from an alarming velocity. (or should I say veloci-raptor-ty... KILL ME!!) But anyway, where was I? Oh yes... We're Back! My whole point being why would a director make a certain type of film catering to a certain type of consumer and then make a completely different film, cater it to a completely different consumer, and spit on his earlier outings by calling fans of them "weirdos". I know... I'm being REEEAAAALLLLLLYYYY overly critical now, but *beep* it! I'll complain about whatever I damn well please. I don't like when something ferocious and fearsome is downgraded into something warm and lovable all for the sake of something schmutzy, which is a word I just made up, but given its context I'm sure you'll understand what it means. Screw it, I'll explain it anyway! By schmutzy, I mean something that's annoyingly goodwilled. Not like The Land Before Time, where all the dinosaurs are cutesy talking retarded children right from the get go, but in We're Back! we're shown the process of "prettifying" firsthand! It's like if someone were to show you footage of a lion savagly attacking a film crew and feasting on the cameraman's regurgitated anal tract right before magic pixie dust is sprinkled all over the screen and transformed into The Lion King. Showing ferocity and savagery in the dinosaurs (at least John Goodman's) and then immediately altering his brain cells so that he's a mouth-breathing mongoloid with laughably short arms and a talent for sodomizing his nostrils with hot dogs is stupid! At least it's stupid from an... older person's perspective, because I half-want (NAY) all-want the T-Rex to just be dropped into the middle of New York as is and just cause a bloodthirsty rampage from which no living thing shall arise... except for maybe zombies... but zombies aren't actually "living" are they... but before I go off on another tangent, let me tell you that when all is said and done We're Back is a mediocre film (even by children's standards), I would sooner show a child a marathon of Speedy Gonzales cartoons and drill into his head every negative stereotype that oozes out of Speedy's exaggerated mouth, not because I'm a bad person but because it's more entertaining. Watching We're Back now just makes me wish I was watching Jurassic Park or Lost World: Jurassic Park (whose title made me ponder when it became cool to shove the subtitle in front of the film's main title) whereas The Land Before Time (also brought to you by the cinematic (ahem) genius of Steven Speilberg and George (ahem) Lucas) makes me get a warm fuzzy feeling that's like nostalgia, but not! Anyway, I guess it's just me and rest of you all could go hump a woodchipper. The *beep* End THANK GOD!

And Troll in Central Park sucked too!

I like the Nostalgia Critic but his fans are idiots.

3. the mother's response was ironic for the viewer since they are real dinosaurs. adult humor that i guess went over your head.

5. usually the middle space is reserved for everything from the beginning to the very end point when it stops, so on a time line "middle future" refers to any time between those points. you should be critical about that ambiguity instead of your i'm not sure