Why couldn't they find him?


I'm re-opening this thread from a few years ago.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108149/board/thread/24333170?d=24333170&p=1#24333170

I see no answer in there, and there's a good chance I still won't get an answer.

Someone here provides as possible answer - that they could have talked to the detective and he wasn't helpful, I find that unlikely though.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108149/board/thread/24001073?d=105742798&p=1#105742798


I don't understand how they were unable to locate or find out more about Paul. This part/flaw of the movie really bothers me. I felt the ending lacking, I just expected that more would happen and then the movie ended. It felt like the movie was building up to something more, but maybe it was just me.

Flan said that he called the detective (which lead to the police picking up Paul). To quote the movie "We hadn't counted on traffic, we promised Paul we would take him to the police. I called our new best friend - the detective." I assume they contacted him with a cell phone. They knew the detective's name, the police lady knew the detective was transferred, it shouldn't have been too hard to find where he was transferred to and to get into contact with him. Then the detective could have talked to whoever made the arrest (or just looked at the records) - got Paul's name (or whatever name he gave them), found out where he was taken, etc.


reply

How about this: The police didn't give a *beep* that a bunch of rich people were freaked out that they had a BLACK man in their home who wasn't related to someone famous.

Near the end they were looking for him I'm sure (what with the murder beef and everything), but his whole 'don't give anyone a real name and live on the street from time to time' spiel worked in his favor.

And remember, it took Channing's character, what, two weeks to look up if Sidney Poitier even HAD a son? I'm not putting a lot of stock into her detective powers.

reply