MovieChat Forums > Jurassic Park (1993) Discussion > I finally figured out the seat belt scen...

I finally figured out the seat belt scene!


I always thought it was stupid early in the movie, where they're getting on the helicopter, and Grant can't get his seatbelt to buckle because someone designed the buckle for his seat wrong. So he's forced to tie the belts he has in a knot over his lap. I kept wondering, who would make such a poor design for a helicopter seat belt?

I didn't realize this was actually a visual foreshadowing for the film. Not until I read about it randomly on Quora. It's one of those movie trivia things that not everyone will pick up on unless someone points it out.

See, one of the themes in the story was that, despite all the animals in the park supposedly being female, some of them apparently mutated to either do parthenogenesis, or somehow changed their sex to become male (don't ask me how the African frogs their DNA was supplemented with could do this) and found a way to breed outside of human influence. (I personally thought it was bullshit, but obviously Crichton wanted to touch on the idea that no matter how hard we try to control something as dangerous as dinosaurs, they always find a way around it. I'll probably touch on it in another thread if I care enough to discuss it).

So in the scene, Grant finds himself with a pair of seatbelts that have two female belt buckle halves, instead of a properly-designed seatbelt that has a male half and a female half on the buckles, and he found a way to stay safe on the helicopter by tying the two female halves in a knot over his lap, symbolizing (without knowing it) the female dinos finding ways around human control.

reply

I think that's a stretch. It just shows that he's a pragmatic, do-what-it-takes, ride-with-the-punches kind of person.

reply

You can look it up, it's part of the movie's trivia, and a good form of foreshadowing, even if not everyone understands it.

reply

Yep, 100% legit, and very well played by Spielberg. I’ve seen JP countless times and never put two and two together until I watched a JP deep dive analysis clip on YouTube. It’s extremely obvious in hindsight but still, I’m a bit disappointed in myself that this went over my head for so long.

reply

Interesting post.

I always saw that scene as a foreshadowing of things going wrong at the park, but Grant somehow figures out a solution to get through it.

It's great how you can interpret different things in a lot of ways in film.

reply

Sometimes a seat belt is just a seat belt.

reply

I thought that for a long time too, until I read that Quora post.

reply

I don't that movie was smart enough for that type of foreshadowing.

reply

It was certainly better-written than the crap that came after it! I call all the sequels, "Dinos Eat the People, Parts 1-5."

reply

Let's drink glasses of water in open cups while driving and place them on the dash so they can shake later on.

A giant dinosaur is attacking us! Here, let me shine a flashlight!

This movie won't win a round of Jeopardy but it's still fun.

reply

Think about it. You have a good, solid, dinosaur disaster flick; it's an original story that had never been tried before, the characters are written well (in fact they're better in the movie than in the book), the acting is good, the special-effects still hold up after 30 years, the music is iconic, and the ending is satisfying.

You can't say the same about any of the sequels at all.

reply

Sure, I can. I didn't mind the second or third movies.

The second movie had a scene that dragged, the vehicle hanging from a cliff, but otherwise they were good.

Now the new trilogy, ugh.

reply

I know! I call it "Jurassic Park for Dummies."

reply

I want to watch the new trilogy but I can't find my copy of it.

Who says there are no miracles anymore?

reply

No.

https://www.mentalfloss.com/posts/sam-neill-debunks-jurassic-park-seatbelt-theory?utm_source=RSS

And it wasn't a poor design, he actually grabbed Laura Dern's part of her seat belt.

reply

Thanks.

Neill had never heard of that interpretation of the scene, and he denied that it was intentional. Rather, he said it was meant to be a humorous character moment for Grant. “No, I don’t think it was meant that way," he told io9. "It was just about Alan Grant hates technology. He hates computers. He hates anything to do with the modern world and the seatbelt, which you’d think it’d be relatively straightforward. But I’d been on helicopters going, ‘Where the hell is the other bit of this?’”

Even if the seatbelt scene wasn't that deep, Neill's comments likely won't stop new generations of Jurassic Park viewers from reading into it. As an amused Neill told io9," This is the sort of thing that happens on the internet."

reply

^^gets it.

reply