Has there ever been another female actress with a pronounced lisp
I am guessing still it is only her character Scully that does this and not Gillian Anderson. Thoughts?
shareTroll.
shareThanks for your non-answer. I wish the thread starter could delete posts like yours from a thread as you are a known thread de-railer. Let's keep this on topic folks.
shareYou are a known X-Files/Gillian Anderson troll with a history of posting non-SENSE.
shareYou'd call me a CSM troll even if I criticized the fake brand of Marlboro cigarettes they show him smoking (Morley). Hyper sensitive people like yourself are the real trolls.
shareby kjm20005 » You'd call me a CSM troll even if I criticized the fake brand of Marlboro cigarettes they show him smoking (Morley). Hyper sensitive people like yourself are the real trolls.
Says the troll resorting to assumption-based strawman arguments to try to distract from the trollish tendencies being made obvious with it's other posts.
share
And you could simply have ignored him until he went away again. Like most people will. Now I suppose you'll engage with him for days and this thread will end up pages long.
shareAnd adding your 2 cents didn't contribute to this thread one iota. What made you decide to even chime in? It wasn't necessary at ALL. But then again, it's what you do.
shareby Wookieebitch » And you could simply have ignored him until he went away again. Like most people will. Now I suppose you'll engage with him for days and this thread will end up pages long.
And you STILL haven't explained the impetus for this newfound animosity and obvious obsession with trying to portray me in a negative way.
As even kjm was able to note though, the irony of your post was indeed thick. share
WB is right (not about you per se, but in general, about the poster) :O I replied to a bunch of his posts, basically calling him an ignoramus because he is aggressively ignorant. But still, she's right.
The suspense is terrible. I hope it'll last.
~Gene Wilder, RIP, Willy Wonka & The Chocolate Factory
by ThreeZs » WB is right (not about you per se, but in general, about the poster) :O I replied to a bunch of his posts, basically calling him an ignoramus because he is aggressively ignorant. But still, she's right.
Then again, a few initial counter-posts can serve as an effective public service announcement to help anyone unaware of kjm's past from getting themselves into a discussion that WE know will turn into a waste of time. share
True. A 'be forewarned' notice.
The suspense is terrible. I hope it'll last.
~Gene Wilder, RIP, Willy Wonka & The Chocolate Factory
And you could simply have ignored him until he went away again. Like most people will. Now I suppose you'll engage with him for days and this thread will end up pages long.
So, kjm came back. I mean, I can see he posted again but I can't see his posts because I have him on ignore. What a troll. And not even a "good troll" if you know what I mean. Everybody should just ignore him. share
Everybody should just ignore him.
Yes, they should but I suspect that somebody will respond to him for days and days and days and then cry about how he's been portrayed negatively when called on it.
And not even a "good troll"
kjm is a pretty piss-poor troll. share
by Wookieebitch » Yes, they should but I suspect that somebody will respond to him for days and days and days and then cry about how he's been portrayed negatively when called on it.
Grudge holder indeed.
And YOU tell ME to grow up.
share
Are you going to continue to stalk my posts? I'm done with you, WTT. I'm sick of the hysterical behavior and the ranting for days and days and days. If you don't want people to call you on your behavior then stop behaving that way.
shareby Wookieebitch >> Are you going to continue to stalk my posts? I'm done with you, WTT. I'm sick of the hysterical behavior and the ranting for days and days and days. If you don't want people to call you on your behavior then stop behaving that way.
What's sad is that you honestly don't seem to understand that in making posts like this, you're doing exactly what I'm saying you're doing. (Trying to portray me in a negative manner).
Your OPINIONS however, are noted.
Feel better now?
And BTW, is everyone supposed to take this as meaning that only YOU can call people out when they're behaving passive-aggressively with thei way they're making their posts?
share
And BTW, is everyone supposed to take this as meaning that only YOU can call people out when they're behaving passive-aggressively with thei way they're making their posts?
Nice. Do you always play stupid when playing the victim? This has everything to do with you loudly proclaiming another poster a troll and throwing a fit because only one person decided to agree with you. And then you continued to harass me about my opinion for days and when I continued to ignore your incessant ranting you decided to go cry about how you'd been treated so poorly to Z. You tried to bully me into feeling the same way you do and when I didn't you cried about "agendas" and how people are out to get you. You've placed far more importance on yourself and your opinion than any of us have.
You're a typical bully. share
And BTW, is everyone supposed to take this as meaning that only YOU can call people out when they're behaving passive-aggressively with thei way they're making their posts?
by Wookieebitch » Nice. Do you always play stupid when playing the victim? This has everything to do with you loudly proclaiming another poster a troll and throwing a fit because only one person decided to agree with you. And then you continued to harass me about my opinion for days and when I continued to ignore your incessant ranting you decided to go cry about how you'd been treated so poorly to Z. You tried to bully me into feeling the same way you do and when I didn't you cried about "agendas" and how people are out to get you. You've placed far more importance on yourself and your opinion than any of us have.
You're a typical bully.
Wow. speaking of playing stupid.
Your post had NOTHING to do with the post you were responding to about about YOUR recent (hypocritical passive-aggressive) actions, and ONLY everything to do with you trying to save face for going off half-cocked before you had all the facts and not wanting to admit you could still possibly be wrong about this whole AG being a troll fiasco.
After all, I'm only a bully in this situation if I'm wrong, and you certainly haven't proven that to be the case...even after days and days of attempting to discredit how others might view my comments with your incessant "crying", "whining", "throwing a fit", "harassment", "bullying" mis-characterizations.
And yet you claim it's ME placing far too much importance on MYself.
It's called a mirror. Check it out.
share
Hi WTT,
Have you read the remainder of the thread? WB and I talk further about what happened, and in that exchange, she explained her thoughts and feelings further. Maybe there's still some room for understanding.
I know it's next to impossible to read these things about oneself and NOT defend oneself. Maybe there's a way to defend oneself and reach an understanding at the same time. I don't know.
Something else. I wrote some things about how it feels to be on the opposing side of you. You're formidable. I apologize in advance if I offend you or if I said anything wrong. I also apologize for anything else I said wrong. My motivation was to understand WB's and your points of view and see if there was some room for both of you in that.
Don't bother.
This comment is everything that needs to be said:
..an opinion of which it has to be admitted could easily be viewed as currently skewed...due to politics and gender of all things based on that persons own comments (which if you'll remember Z's, I suggested as both being a possibility via PM quite a few days ago).
So, he's basically not taking any responsibility for his actions but is blaming it on his gender and the current political climate. Before it was "agendas" and now it's because he's a man. He's a man who behaved like a douche but he'd rather not admit that.
And he's still prattling on about how we haven't proven that AG isn't a troll. Yet he has yet to prove that he is a troll.
If you both want to bitch about how mean I am then take it to PM and have your little whine fest. share
If you both want to bitch about how mean I am then take it to PM and have your little whine fest.
WB, I'm not going to do that. I think you know that.
FWIW, I'm informed by the recent political climate, too, and don't tolerate bullying (and sexism, in my case) like I once did. Along with a sense of entitlement, it's become an epidemic in American culture. share
WB, I'm not going to do that. I think you know that.
I do but I suspect that WTT would really enjoy it if you did. share
by ThreeZs » Hi WTT, Something else. I wrote some things about how it feels to be on the opposing side of you. You're formidable. I apologize in advance if I offend you or if I said anything wrong. I also apologize for anything else I said wrong. My motivation was to understand WB's and your points of view and see if there was some room for both of you in that.
It's been clear that you've tried to maintain an objective viewpoint from the start, so where your responses to my comments are concerned, you have nothing to apologize for. I know I've not been trying to "bludgeon" anyone with my comments anyway because I'm aware that I CAN get wordy at times - for a specific reason I've already explained. Fair enough?
WookieBitch on the other hand just provided another example of how she's tried to twist (based on misinterpretation) some of my comments to suit herself, in this case by trying to suggest that I was talking about myself when I mentioned gender and politics in my previous post.
YOU and I both know I was talking about a possible explanation for WB's recent behavior towards me that I'd suggested in one of my recent PM's...where I was referring to comments SHE has made in the past where she clearly illustrated politics and gender as having been an influence in comments that SHE made.
- And BTW Wookie, in those PM's to Z's, I've never once referred to your comments here as being "mean". And rather than them being "bitchy whine fests", my PM's to Z's have centered around trying to understand why you've been behaving as obstinately towards me as you have lately. I can bring this up publicly because I know Z's could honestly substantiate/corroborate how I'm characterizing my PM's and not be accused of taking a side and having that held against her. (That's a benefit of being objective when forming opinions.)
I do suspect however you'd really enjoy it if my PM's HAD been able to be viewed in that way though.
In that light Z's, I "believe" I can "claim" that I've ALREADY been trying to understand WB's comments, intents, and motivations while defending myself. If to suit their own purposes some conveniently resort to not acknowledging that as having taken responsibility for my OWN actions...well...what else is new?
share