MovieChat Forums > SeaQuest DSV (1993) Discussion > Why did they decide to switch to "stupid...

Why did they decide to switch to "stupid" story lines in season 2?


Was it a cost saving idea or ...??

reply

Why did you decide to come on here and bitch about a show that went off the air 20 years ago?

reply

Because I hadn't seen the show since it was first on ... and recently downloaded all 3 seasons (as I remembered liking it).

I enjoyed the first season.

Thanks for the info.

reply

I've mentioned the "too many cooks" thing before, but it fits again, as many new shows suffer from the same problem.
Instead of having one person or a small group come up with ideas, every producer (and on modern shows there are a LOT of them) wants his/her input, and most of them have no concept what the show is really about or what they're doing. So you get screaming plants, unfrozen crocodiles, glowing poop and the like (or chimpanzees, the go-to yock-fest/attention-grabber idea that almost every show sinks to.) SeaQuest was no different in that far too many 'cooks' added everything and anything to the idea until it became unrecognizable from O'Bannon's original idea (see Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea.)

No fate but what we make. -Terminator II

reply

It wreaks of network meddling. I'm going to say X-Files came out the same time as Seaquest, and became very popular. I can picture network heads in a board room going "hey that x-files show is doing really well, lets just do that".

reply

I read somewhere that they started with a basically science-oriented show in the first season, changed to science fiction in the second and finally to just plain action fantasy in the third. It was all an effort to gain more viewers. It never occurred to the network bigwigs to give the show a different time slot so it wasn't competing with Lois & Clark for demographics that had a lot of overlap.

reply

I think it had to do something with the success of "Xenia: Warrior Princess" and "Tarzan" [both in syndication at the time].

Actually, that has to be the only reason.

reply

man, hearing Xena and Lois and Clark makes me miss the 90s shows and being a kid in this time (Hercule and Lois and Clark were my faves). But I agree. I watched SeaQuest, I think by accident, and saw 'Brody' from Jaw in it so watched and loved it. It's a shame when executives try to make a show something it isn't. I definitely liked the 1st season the best.

reply

Ratings..

reply

From what I gathered, there was a lot of studio meddling and in-fighting behind the scenes;particularly between the cast and crew. Kind of like with Sliders but not as bad.

reply

Roy Scheider publicly bad mouthed the show. And that 2nd season was AWFUL.

The show never got above 70 in the Nielsen ratings for any of it's 3 seasons.

It had a decent demo's which notched it a 2nd season.

Surprised it ever went to achieved a 3rd one.

But it did.

reply

[deleted]

Came here to read up on the boards of all my favorite shows and I completely forgot there was a season 3. I think I completely blocked it out of my head. I don't think I watched it because i hated the finale of the 2nd season.

reply

It's available on Peacock. Season 3 is actually pretty good, but it's not very "fun".

reply

I bought the first 2 seasons on DVD about 2 years ago. maybe I'll think about watching season 3 just to watch it. maybe I'll appreciation it more now that in my teens.

reply

There's some fun.

--The special effects are surprisingly better than they were in the first two seasons.
--Jonathan Brandis becomes an "ensign" and gets #2nd billing.
--Roy Scheider returns for 3 or 4 episodes.
--"Second Chances" is one of the best episodes of the entire series.



reply

I never got around to watching this show, but didn't it have Joxer the Mighty in it? He's very tidy, you know.

reply

Ted Raimi. Yes he's one of the few cast members who survived all 3 seasons.

reply

I always get a kick when I see Ted Raimi in things...Seaquest and Spiderman...sadly, it will always come with the exclamation of "Joxer!!!!!!!" Great character.

reply