MovieChat Forums > Malcolm X (1992) Discussion > Why should ANYONE take moral lectures fr...

Why should ANYONE take moral lectures from a career criminal?!!!


While I do believe the real Malcolm X turned his life around and did plenty of good for his people, why would his people (or anyone for that matter) listen to a hardened career criminal and con man just because he now says he found Jesus/Allah/whatever in the can?

It's one thing to listen to a man who has been a man of peace all his life (Jesus, Buddhah, Gandhi, etc), or even a former man of arms (Saint Paul, Saint Ignasius of Loyola, Saint Francis). But a former career criminal?

I'm not against such people reforming and paying back society for all the trouble they caused (that's what missions are for), but not for taking morality lessons from them.

I mean, how do you know they're not pulling your leg? Anyone who says "what's past is past" is an IDIOT: for what's past is in fact PROLOGUE.

To put it mildly: would you take moral advice from a "reformed" Tony Soprano, for example?

reply

You take moral lessons from the 12 apostles yes?

Well, they were adulterers, liars, thieves, murderers and prostitutes.

The holy vatican system of which close to 1.5 billion people look to for morality are responsible for surpressing science and women and large scale child abuse.

Malcolm X was a thief and a liar early in his life, people looked up to him because he WAS a criminal and not a saint. People could relate to him and he spoke from personal experience.

reply

"Well, they were adulterers, liars, thieves, murderers and prostitutes"

Funny, which one is said to be any of such things? They're fishermen, nothing else is stated about them. Which version of the Bible you got that from?

"People could relate to him and he spoke from personal experience."

It's ONE thing to relate to him, and quite another to get morality lessons from him. Like having Mike Tyson teach your kids at Sunday school. I'm sure he's had just as much experience if not more than Malcolm X in his hard live to share.

Better yet: get yourself a sermon from Don King himself...

reply

I think the biggest misperception or myth of Malcolm's legacy was that he was some sort of "thug" or "bad seed" who makes a dramatic change into becoming an influential leader. But in regard to him being a deviant, nothing is further from the truth.

Yes, he was a former criminal, but he engaged in crimes not so because he was a a "bad person." He engaged in crime because as a black man during that specific time period it was the only he could achieve the "American Dream" of success.

One of the most memorable scenes of this movie, at least for me, occurs when Shorty and Sophia transport Malcolm back to Boston after Malcolm's run-in with West Indian Archie in Harlem. While sitting in the back seat of the car, Malcolm (or "Red" as he was known then) reflects and says how black guys like Archie, who had high mathematical aptitude as a numbers runner, could have been scientists or how Malcolm himself could have become a great lawyer had he his aspirations not been shattered by his jr. high school teacher. But as Malcolm said, "We were all victims of the American social order." Meaning that because they were black, they were all denied the opportunity to embark on legitimate professional careers and their only choice for achieving success was the underworld.

It wasn't so much that Malcolm was a deviant or "carer criminal." It was just that illegitimate operations--such as prostitution, robbery, and drug dealing--were the only means for black men of Malcolm's generation to attain money.

reply

OK, I can believe that. If that is the case indeed (much of what I know of the man comes from the likes of Fox News, very little from people like say Chomsky or Howard Zim).

Good reply I have to admit...

reply

To expand on that a little- many poor blacks TODAY feel like they have to resort to some kind of illegal activity to buy their way into that 'dream'. The blueprint for obtaining some measure of wealth involves entertaining the white man: running, jumping, throwing balls, singing, dancing, rapping, etc. If you don't have any talent, there's always street crime and we know how boatloads of cocaine gets into this country; it isn't blacks flying or shipping it in and through customs. The game is rigged and all it gets you is nothing in the end, because they'll always own you. They're funneling blacks straight to prison to keep poor whites employed at the state prisons and rich whites trading them on Wall Street.

Blacks need to own their own businesses.

"The pain only reminds us that we are alive."

reply

Your statements have made it unnecessary for me to say anything further. This is a great film.

reply

I just realized that Malcolm did the same thing to Laura.

reply

> It wasn't so much that Malcolm was a deviant or "carer criminal." It was just that illegitimate operations--such as prostitution, robbery, and drug dealing--were the only means for black men of Malcolm's generation to attain money.

That’s belied by the fact that Malcolm was able to provide for himself by legal means upon release from prison. And ignores that the vast majority of Blacks at that time provided for themselves through legal means. Malcolm Little made some bad choices early in his life.

reply

[deleted]

give me a break.... the most supposedly esteemed people up there... priests, cops, politicians.... They are some of the most dirty people out there.

A reformed criminal has seen it all.

When it comes down to it, we ALL dirty.... Yes, even you. In fact, especially you. So, yes, i will trust the guy who's come clean about him being dirty over some self-proclaimed angel.

reply

"he most supposedly esteemed people up there... priests, cops, politicians.... They are some of the most dirty people out there"

And they all have long track records of it, at least suspicion (father Marcial Maciel from Mexico for example, protected by John Paul II, EVERYONE knew the allegations back home, and the same can be said of any bad politician/cop out there for their sins are well known to everyone).

People whom have been known all their lives to be righteous (as close as can be) like say Salvadoran Archbishop Óscar Romero (stood up to the US backed death squads) or Mexican father "Chinchachoma" (whom spent most of his live preaching and LIVING alongside street children sharing in their poverty) have never have to convince anyone about their true intentions, for their PUBLIC track record spoke for them.

So your point is rather moot.

"A reformed criminal has seen it all."

That can be true, but the sincere ones will be the last ones to try to pretend to have any standing to preach to anyone. That's the giveaway to tell sincere ones from con mens.

Malcolm X was conning and deceiving people when under the Nation of Islam (out of ignorance sure, and when he found out he left them). AFter he began to speak for himself notice how he became way less authoritative, realizing he was nobody to preach to anyone about anything.

reply

"People whom have been known all their lives to be righteous (as close as can be) like say Salvadoran Archbishop Óscar Romero (stood up to the US backed death squads) or Mexican father "Chinchachoma" (whom spent most of his live preaching and LIVING alongside street children sharing in their poverty) have never have to convince anyone about their true intentions, for their PUBLIC track record spoke for them."

Like John Wayne Gacy?

reply

You're right - Mandela was in this toward the end.

reply

The biggest con man through all of this was Elijah Muhammad. And though Malcolm was street smart, he, like many other Black ppl who, as he said, "had been had, been took, been hoodwinked, bamboozled, led astray, run amok," by Elijah Muhammad's version of Islam. I grew up in the NOI, and my momma was fanatical in her belief in Elijah Muhammad, that he was the closest thing God Himself, as did so many misguided Black ppl. While those poor, yet loyal followers gave up their last dollar, nickel and dimes toward the "propagation of Islam in the Wilderness if North America", that money was making Elijah Muhammad and his family Croesus-rich. While many of the devout were driving jalopies or riding the bus to and from where they had to go, Muhammad and his crew were driven around in limos or driving big ass cars and such. My father was the cartoonist for the Muhammad Speaks newspaper, and he worked diligently damn near day and night to see that the paper got out on time. I attended the Muslim elementary and high school and rode the school bus. We lived in one of the "Nation's Buildings" where two apartments were Elijah Muhammad's "love nests" for his trysts with the secretaries he was boning. My momma even found a birth certificate listing his name as the baby daddy of one his womens' kid. This was around 1963, when the scandal was hot copy for the press, and around the same time Minister Malcolm had probably found out about it and the betrayal by Elijah Muhammad.

reply

Why shouldn't anyone listen to a moral lecture from someone who was a career criminal? How on Earth could he pull my leg? I'm not going to instantly agree with everything he says. It's not like someone could tell me that stealing is okay and I'd suddenly become a thief because I mistakenly listened to them and became unable to form my own opinions. The value of listening to people like Malcolm X comes not from the fact that I can follow in their footsteps, but rather that I might better understand where they came from and why they were criminals. The main issue I take with your statement is that many of the good people you mention taught that people could genuinely change for the better, and several lived lifestyles that they later thought were wrong. You should take your own advice and listen to them.

reply

"I might better understand where they came from and why they were criminals"

That's documentary lesson, not moral one. No different from interviewing/studying Ted Bundy in jail.

"many of the good people you mention taught that people could genuinely change for the better, and several lived lifestyles that they later thought were wrong."

Heh, what good people are you referring to? All the ones I mentioned except Tony Soprano are in the OK category, so you can't be referring to them.

And they didn't really change: they simply became better versions of the GOOD person they already were.

The only one whom changed radically his lifestyle was Saint Francis (was a party freak), but even he wasn't depraved or corrupted before. So even him doesn't apply.

You would have a point had Malcolm spent say 10 to 20 years doing missionary work and THEN started preaching. By then he could point to a new track record of good behaviour to back up his claims of having turned his life around. Quite differently to start preaching fresh out of jail (everybody finds religion in the pen).

Nope, what else you got?





reply