On Dr. Phil right now.
Dr. Phil is interviewing one of the murderers on today's show, Karen.
shareShe acted like she had no remorse. She needs locked back up
share
MovieChat Forums > A Killer Among Friends (1992) Discussion > On Dr. Phil right now.
Darn it. I would have liked to have seen that. Does his show ever repeat?
shareIt's available on YouTube.
Dr Phil December 17, 2014 : The Night Four Girls ?: http://youtu.be/yXeKwI1C5d0
She showed absolutely no remorse. The actress who portrayed her in the movie was spot on. The entire interview she seemed like she was lying. Like poor pitiful Karen. I didn't do anything wrong. Everyone else is the bad guy.
They should've both GOT LIFE IN PRISON WITHOUT PAROLE - NEVER EVER GET OUT OF JAIL OR THEY SHOULD'VE GOT THE DEATH PENALTY - *beep* IT WAS PREMEDITATED MURDER!
These 2 jealous raged bitches planned the whole murder of this young vibrant beautiful girl, I have no faith in the justice system at all and I worked for a "certain part of the Federal Courts, I was a Librarian"; anyway I hope she is resting in peace now but how could she when these monsters are able to live their life. I wish them nothing but misery and loneliness for all the rest of their pathetic lives. I also hope they can't sleep at night and have horrific vision nightmares - hope she's haunting them forever but then again I want her to RIP as well, but both of them deserve to have miserable lives - cold sweats at night, sleepless nights taunting them b/c they should be buried under the prison not set free!!! Again we have a sucky judicial system its not fair at all!
I'll play devil's advocate for a moment, as I agree with you.
I'm thinking their lawyers successfully got second- degree murder as they didn't seem to be armed when they attacked her. Either that, or the prosecutor lowered the charge as without any evidence of a weapon having been used, he knew he couldn't get first-degree.
I do believe it was premeditated murder. Unless they were really stupid, they would not plan to take her some place and just beat her up, knowing they would get arrested for that. They wanted her dead, and really thought they would get away with it forever.
shareI absolutely think it was, as well. Two - they thought three - against one, and all those rocks to use as weapons, etc. I was just theorizing that a decent defense attorney could have had jurors - who, after all, aren't (but should be!) required to take IQ tests - believing that the girls' not having brought with them a gun, knives, whatever, "meant" that the murder wasn't premeditated, hence the conviction on second-degree.
I remember that after the OJ verdict, a reporter still obviously shocked by the not guilty verdict asked one of the jurors, "But what about ALL of the DNA evidence?!" The woman replied, "Oh that was just a bunch of nonsense."
well , i guess a jurur thats been through that much bullshit for that long , probly thinks "We'll never get to go home until we pronounce him onnocent"
Yeah, DNA evidence is "bullshit"
i didnt say that , i agree DNA is incontrovertible.
so why did it drag on for years? the jurors probly felt like prisoners
From what I remember, there was juror intimidation going on for them to give a "not guilty" verdict. Also, I don;t think the trial went on for years. Close to a year, but not years.
share