Not Bad


But far from the best. The sets, costumes special effects, cinematography, for example, were first-rate and the acting was fair-to-middling. The weak point was the script. It changed too much of the story, in my opinion.

I'm open to a good discussion of the script.

reply

this used to be my absolute favorite film but I like it less and less as time goes on, even though visually it remains strong in many ways.

reply

My least favorite thing is the love story between Mina and Dracula which was just made up for the film.

reply

Agreed. Elisabeta was not even hinted at in the book, and neither was the reincarnation stuff.

The film did have some nice touches; for example, the blue flames on the ground that told of the locations of treasures, but over-all, I thought the script was the weak point in the film.

reply

My favorite remains the 1977 BBC effort Count Dracula. This is due, in large part. to it's fidelity to the novel. The acting was superb and the atmosphere was very dark and nicely done.

reply

This is a travesty of the novel, beneath contempt.

reply

The weakest points in this film are:

1. Keanu Reeves. You'd bump the film up a solid gold star just for casting Harker more appropriately.
2. Dracula and Mina romance. I'm specifically thinking of where they go to the movies and have a few dates. It's tonally bizarre and isn't followed-through by the rest of the movie. This is, from a script standpoint, where the movie falls flat. I don't mind the prologue and Dracula falling in love with Mina, but only if done more subtly, less with this weird period romance-drama in the middle of the Gothic horror movie.
3. Winona Ryder. This is a distant third. She doesn't seem that bad to me, but I am suspicious that, if you got rid of Reeves, Ryder would start to look a little weak tea compared to Oldman and Hopkins.

As you say, the look of the film, it's design and camerawork, are spectacular. The performances of most of the main cast (Tom Waits!) was great. But there are weak points that really, REALLY hurt the film.

reply

The whole film is beautiful visually but I do agree that the cinema/date is weird. I can't help but think it was all a bit of an excuse to throw in some "Steam punk" influence, the mix of old world and the new world mixing together.

reply

You are probably right about that they just wanted steam punk in there. I bet a lot of this movie came out of, "this will look SO GREAT!"

reply

I like it a lot.

The visual effects. The sets. The bigger than life acting.

reply