Overrated big time


...I'm surprised I haven't seen a post like this here yet, maybe I just haven't looked hard enough. There's always some edgy contrarian out there who has to say some brilliant classic is actually lame. SIGH

reply

I saw both in original releases. I really really liked the first terminator. I thought T2 was, whatever, not as good as the first. Plus T2 had all this hype and all this "intellectual" analysis - it was like talking to people who worship the rock bank Rush. I thought Total Recall was the more "makes ya think" film.

reply

As a Rush fan (and a T1 over T2 fan) I can tell you there isn't a ton of intellectualizing about the band. I think what you've experienced is early enthusiasm and normally goes by the wayside and evolves into appreciating them for who they are. While your bad experience is typical it's also not the norm among the long-term fanbase. Maybe you just know someone with a chip on their shoulder.

reply

I rest my case.

reply

Remember: haters are always far more annoying than fanboys.

reply

I don't hate it. In fact I thought it was better than the original....not now though

reply

The fact that chilidog thinks my reply is an intellectual analysis speaks volumes in and of itself. LOL. I didn't bother with him further because I knew it couldn't go anyplace worthwhile.

reply

"haters are always far more annoying than fanboys.'

I disagree. Many people, not all or even most, become "haters" of a work of art BECAUSE of the Fanboys of it. I admit that when told over and over about how great a thing is that I was just meh on, I slowly begin to dislike the art.

What I have never done is gone from meh to a fanboy because I heard someone that did not like the thing.

reply

People crap on this film all the time! I like this film a lot and hate it when people nitpick it.

reply

I love this movie, I regard it as the definitive action movie.

reply

Maybe not straight action, but overall I agree. Best action/sci-fi film ever made. It's pitch-perfect, from start to end.

reply

It's overrated. For me, it begins and ends with the first film.

reply

There's been posts like this garbage for years on this movie. Why not make actual points as to why you feel this movie is overrated? Not that I care to read them unless you actually have fair points.

reply

I don't think you read my post, which is in line with what I've seen on Moviechat - serious comprehension problems.

reply

your post kinda tricked me into thinking you hate the movie had to read twice to realise you dont

reply

I was referring to that dmac clown.

reply

T2 is overrated in the sense that people say it’s better than T1. T2 introduces a lot more convoluted story elements and felt like the writers had written themselves into a corner. For one, there’s the oft-mentioned plot hole of a liquid metal terminator being able to go back. In that case, why not just send back a swarm of nanobots that can fly through the air like bees and just murder John Connor that way.

Also in T1 it was made very clear that the TDE was destroyed after Reese was sent through, and nothing else could go back. So then we are to believe that Skynet had another time machine as well and had sent back an even more powerful terminator, even though their defense grid was smashed and the T800 was a last resort? It’s never explained how Skynet was able to send back the T1000. And also brings into question why they didn’t send back multiple terminators to kill John.

Thirdly, there is the issue of T2 being too kid-friendly. Now we all know the story reasons why the T800 can’t kill anyone, but at some point it makes the terminators seem not as threatening when we know they can be reprogrammed to be cute and cuddly. Also there was a sense of menace in the first film that everyone’s lives were in danger, that is just gone in T2 when everyone’s lives get spared except for the occasional killing by the T1000. The horror/slasher vibe of the original is just gone.

Sarah also feels like a completely different person now, and it makes sense that she would suffer from PTSD, the character is also more grating and less like able this time around. In a way she’s even more of a damsel needing to be “saved” and told what to do by her 12 year old son. In the original she was simply a regular person with spunk, who managed to kill the Terminator on her own without needing to be saved at the last minute by anyone. Also Sarah is much more butch and masculine in T2, as opposed to the more likeable and relatable Sarah from the first film. (Continued in part II).

reply

The whole movie was a cash grab, which is why they aimed it to children. People praising it were those kids, and too dumb to see it for what it was. A stupid mess! Oh Terminators back, and he's just going to put on shades again because the last time, he had to poke out his fricken EYE! and needed to conceal it, but this time, it's just to be cool. Cause he's with some hip rebel teen who knows all the latest cringe sayings.

reply

STFU, troll!

reply

(Continued) IMO, T2 is more misogynist in this regard by implying women can only be “strong” by being masculine, as opposed to the loveable feminine qualities of Sarah in the first, who used her intellect more than raw force to survive.

Also Edward Furlong’s performance, while not terrible, does end up dragging the film down somewhat due to his whiny, pubescent voice, and generally brattish behaviour. The film would have been better if John was 17, and played by an older actor in his 20s. That way we’d get a better image of who John Connor is, instead of a petulant brat.

And finally, there is the truth that T2 is really just a big budget remake of the first film. It copies the same plot points and is largely just a re-run of a story we’ve seen before, is in a way we already know how it ends. Even the Cyberdyne subplot is reused from deleted material in the first film. I feel like the existence of T2 keeps the first film forming being a wonderfully self-contained story that never needed any sequels.

Now all this makes it sound like I hate T2. I don’t, I think T2 is a great action picture and a very good movie. But I don’t think it is the best Terminator sequel that could have been made, and in many ways diminishes the first film, or dumbs it down. I think after Terminator and Aliens Cameron has blown his load, creatively, and from then on was a more by-the-numbers filmmaker.

P.S. Also the sound effects in Terminator 2 are simply horrible. By this I mean the sound for the guns. The T1000’s beretta sounds like a silenced pistol. For some reason they also added this sound to Terminator 1 later on.

reply

The way that they softened the violence reminds me of Evil Dead 2. In that movie, they changed the colour of the blood so as to make sure the movie didn't get an X rating.

Also, you could argue that Evil Dead 2 deviates from the narrative of the first movie enough to be a remake in the same way that T2 deviated from T1.

reply

IMO, T2 is more misogynist in this regard by implying women can only be “strong” by being masculine, as opposed to the loveable feminine qualities of Sarah in the first, who used her intellect more than raw force to survive.


O Dios Mio! NOOOOOOO!!!!

James Cameron wanted Sarah Connor to be cut from the same cloth as every male action star. To do that, he had her dress in the exact same cliché style that every movie put them in. For example, every male action hero strutted around in a tank top, so Cameron had her wear a tank top. All the male action heroes had a signature scene where they were showing off ripped biceps while holding an automatic weapon, so Cameron had her do that, too. It's nothing to do with "misogyny", any more than it would if you decide to put a female character in a cape, mask and tights to show that she is a superhero.

reply

^ This! Thank you, Mina. You got here first. I’ve been around women bodybuilders all my adult life and I think they are VERY feminine and attractive. Geez, Schwarzenegger himself trained her. Muscles are not gender-specific.

reply

It's so bizarre how muscles are equated with masculinity these days when comic books were filled with muscle-bound chicks and the WWE got its second wind by adding female wrestlers to the roster.

reply

It's so bizarre how muscles are equated with masculinity these days when comic books were filled with muscle-bound chicks

Comic books were filled with "muscle-bound" chicks whose exaggerated tits and asses were their main physical features. Comics were NEVER filled with female characters who had muscles anywhere near as big as their male counterparts, because that doesn't reflect reality. She-Hulk, for example, was portrayed as very muscular for a woman, but maybe a fourth the size of the actual Hulk.
and the WWE got its second wind by adding female wrestlers to the roster.

You mean all those super hot big tit "wrestlers" in the late 90's and early 2000's, who were basically strippers? They were jack-off material for 13 year old boys who still watched wrestling!

And yes, they did give the WWE a second wind back then. As softcore PORN.

reply

IMO, T2 is more misogynist in this regard by implying women can only be “strong” by being masculine
I dont know where to start .
where does it imply that?
you just cant win - women treated as equal - this guy complaining.
I'm not wasting more metaphorical breath on this as no doubt "degree7" wont be back to argue any of his/her nutjob theories

reply

What "intellect" did she use to outwit the Terminator in T1? She was on the run the whole movie and was basically kept alive because of Reese. If anything, T1 is more "misogynistic" than T2 because it uses the much clicheed "damsel in distress" trope. At least, Sarah in T2 could hold her own. I would argue she wasn´t even "masculine" from a physical pov, unless you think the ability to handle weapons makes her "manly", in which case, that would be rather misogynistic of you.

reply

T2 was a Work of Art, A Winner, Box Office Smash, and a Classic the day it was released.

reply

Did I say otherwise? You're almost as bad as the people I described in my post, considering you didn't even read it.

reply

No need to be a whiney little bitch. We're all friends here.

reply

No need to be a presumptive harebrained asshole. We're all friends here.

Next time a "my mistake, I guess I should have read at least one single sentence of your post - damn I look kind of dumb" will do fine. Remember, we're all friends here, so don't rage too hard.

reply