Filmsite ranks Hopkins' Oscar win as among "the worst"?
Filmsite is such an elite, art-house based site which imposes its film school crap onto people, especially when talking about Oscar "injustice" wins in hindsight, like complaining that Citizen Kane lost an Oscar to How Green Was My Valley, in which case historical context would have made such a win impossible (it would take years for CK to catch on with viewers).
http://www.filmsite.org/worstoscars.html
But one bizarre complaint of theirs is that Anthony Hopkins' win was undeserved. Not only that but that the more deserving winner was Robert De Niro in Cape Fear?
This I don't get - how is De Niro's portrayal of Max Cady more worthy? Aside from the fact that De Niro had already won twice, but his Cady is horribly overacted, almost cartoonish, IMHO. Heck, his isn't even the definitive version, for me. Robert Mitchum's more relaxed and "not obviously threatening" Cady was far more worthy of an Award than was De Niro. So, its hardly an injustice - methinks Filmsite is just looking for things to complain about, lol.