MovieChat Forums > La double vie de Véronique (1991) Discussion > Interesting, but not quite succeeded.

Interesting, but not quite succeeded.


This was a beautiful film obviously, and I think it's very brave to make a film about one of the hardest subjects I could personally think of. It was also plain to see that Kieslowski an Piesiewicz put more than a couple of hours of thought in it.

But this was not only one of the hardest subjects, it's also a question that will most likely never be answered. Could anyone be sure that there is someone almost identical to you? And more importantly, that that persons actions somehow influence your actions? Not directly, not in the action-reaction way, but purely instinctive? So that in a sense, someone else (or is it an extension of yourself?) is living your life, determining or at least influencing your choices?

These are questions that are impossible to answer, and although these writers came a long way, they too failed on shedding enough light on the subject to make it understandable. I'm not sure why, but throughout the movie I more and more began to feel that there was going to come some kind of closure to the story, some kind of explanation of what I had seen. It didn't come.
I loved how certain events were situated after each other, for example when Weronika and Veronique meet. Well, they don't really meet but you get it. Weronika is obviously stunned and she almost seems enlightened because her feeling that she's not alone gets feet on the ground now. After this, she performs for the orchestra leader and she gets selected because she does an amazing job. During her performance she is obviously in an extremely good mood, almost in ecstasy because she had seen Veronique. Such things strengthen the feeling that they are connected, that their actions affect each other.

But I was longing for more of these scenes, where ones actions had a direct effect on the other. On the other hand I loved the subtleties, but somehow I had the feeling that the large amount of symbolism in the film kept the relationship between Weronika and Veronique on a too artificial level.

I hope someone can in one way or the other relate to what I'm saying, because I'm more or less describing a feeling, which I find pretty hard. So that could be the reason why you might find the above a bit fague.

reply

I don't think you're being vague. The movie was about vague feelings that are accompanied by uncertainty.

reply

The movie was about vague feelings that are accompanied by uncertainty.
Are you sure about that?




Loriginals #1

reply

they too failed on shedding enough light on the subject to make it understandable
Wow, you actually think they were trying to explain it? Because they weren't. Mainly for the reason you cite: it's impossible. They know this. I was a bit frustrated too, but I get what the film was trying to do. I believe it was trying to evoke the feeling of longing for answers. Just like Veronique was frustrated that the cassette tape was just a game the puppeteer was playing(as she expected the answers to everything) same way we are frustrated at the movie. The film is a mediation on metaphysics, the unexplainable, the intangible yet very existent. If I had to put this film in a category I would put it in Science Fiction.
large amount of symbolism
I'd say alot of it wasn't symbolic, but literal. Like Veronique quiting music for no apparent reason. It could be because of something concerning Veronika, it has to be. It would be an incident like the one the puppeteer told, about one twin touching a stove and getting burned and the next day the other twin somehow knowing not to touch the stove. But like I said the movie deals with metaphysics, something that redefines logic.

reply