MovieChat Forums > City Slickers (1991) Discussion > 6.6 what's up with the low rating?

6.6 what's up with the low rating?


Shouldn't this movie be like an 8 or 9????

It's more then a comedy..

"Wait!" "Worry" "Who Cares?"

www.alienexperience.com
tiwwa.info/



reply

I was about to make the same posting, but you've read my mind. I'm not calling this movie Casablanca, but seriously, how could anyone give it a low rating?

reply

I agree; once I realized what "the one thing" was in my life, I got engaged.

reply

IMDb is what's up w/ the low rating. The fact that this film sits only 0.3 points higher than the travesty that is Chuck & Larry (and 0.2 lower than Will Ferrell's cloying manchiuld act Elf) is downright criminal--but a crime not uncommon on this site.

"Well, for once the rich white man is in control!" C. M. Burns

reply



agree!

reply

Yep, it should definitely be higher.

reply

yes I was shocked at this, but really who cares what a bunch of morons think who gave it a low rating? it means nothing. this is a classic movie

reply

Its a comedy that isn't really funny.. A 6.6 is too high except most of the ratings on this site are skewed.

I'm glad I watched it, but wasn't impressed

5 / 10

reply

Probably because of the people who give The Dark Knight, The Dark Knight Rises, 300, and Sin City a 10/10. These people probably give this and other good movies a 1.

"You want me to roll 6,000 of these!? What? Should I quit my job!?" George Seinfeld

reply

WAY TOO LOW OF A RATING!

reply

It's probably got something to do with the demographics of the 34000 voters (not huge) using the meter. The movie was really popular...23 years ago and most of that big audience may not necessarily use IMDB and rate it.

I've always liked the movie, but don't think it's faultless by any means and give it 7/10.

reply

Most of "that big audience" may be dead.

reply

Well that's a little extreme. I just prefer to think they may not be utilizing this particular form of social media to a huge degree.🐭

reply

rotten tomatoes gave a 90%, which is better than some movies in the top 250

reply