Why? Why? Why?
Why are they making a remake of this and ruining a classic!? I know Hollywood is stupid, but THIS stupid? I'm losing faith in the movie industry, they just can't leave a classic alone....
shareWhy are they making a remake of this and ruining a classic!? I know Hollywood is stupid, but THIS stupid? I'm losing faith in the movie industry, they just can't leave a classic alone....
shareThe remake is on hold and maybe cancelled for now if that makes you happy. I think it's bad though, I don't get how anyone thinks a bad remake takes anything at all away from the original. And in this case I think the original was flawed, the remake could have been better with a bigger budget "R" rated film that could be more true to the novel.
shareIf anything, a bad remake can make the original look much better than it is. If there are two It movies and one sucks, you're most likely going to mentally compare against the other movie before you compare it to anything else. If there is only one It movie, you have no choice but to compare it to other horror movies, and most likely you will be comparing it to other good horror movies.
If people are really that worried, they should look at all the other horror franchises out there with crappy remakes. People generally just forget about the remake if it turns out to be a downgrade.
To answer why it bothers so many of us, when they do a remake and it sucks, is because, when they do so, and the younger generation, that has no idea what the original looked like, won't have the idea, to even go and watch the original, because they lose the enticement of watching it all together.
shareThey again have figure out how to remove King's huge "Pedophile" little girl scean having sex with all the boy's her clearly enjoying "Fat Boy"?
Not getting weird, just pointing out the book.
Hardly a pedophile little girl, the boys are the same age.
shareThey could just skip it the same way this version did? Its been awhile since I read the book, but wasn't it some sort of "bonding" thing that they did to gain the courage to fight It? That scene didn't directly lead to any plot events, so cutting it could go unnoticed.
shareI just finished the book yesterday and that scene was after they had faced It with the Ritual of Chud. I guess they started to feel their bond with each other give way and couldn't find their way out. I guess that was Bev's way to remedy that.
Having just read it, I still don't know if it was necessary or even makes sense.
This garbage is NOT a classic. It is extremely badly made. Badly acted, badly photographed, extremely cheesy "scares." Horrible cheesy score etc. It is complete trash.
shareTHANK YOU! I don't understand the hype about this piece of *beep* I think people are looking at it through their nostalgia glasses.
shareI don't know why you're "losing faith". The film industry has been doing this type of thing since its own infancy. Anyway it's not like they're remaking Casablanca or something. They're re-adapting a book that has lots of potential that the 1990 version wasn't able to tap into.
shareA classic? The acting in this was horrible, they changed too much from the book, and the whole movie felt rushed. Remaking it into two movies may be the only way to actually get a decent it movie. Tim curry was the only good part about this version.
shareI absolutely love this movie but more for nostalgic reasons than anything. Its not terrible but it certainly isnt brilliant and it does have scope to do better. I'm actually for a remake to see what they can do 25 years later but I'll always stay faithful to the original and I cannot see anyone doing a better job than Curry as Pennywise.
shareI love this movie so much too. I'm curious to see a remake but it won't hold power as this one did. I agree it is a classic. It's one of the first King movies I saw and loved.
shareIt's hardly a classic I would say. It's a good Stephen King movie but that's that.
Tim Curry is probably the only reason to see It and they focus the movie on that, but that's not what It is about at all. Rather it's abut how adults are the real monsters, the power and importance of friendship and that's what the book focuses on. Pennywise is important but he's not the main focus, he's merely an manifestation of all the evil surrounding the Losers and Derry.
I hope a new version focuses on this aspect rather than Pennywise aspect, but for that matter without losing Pennywise completely. Cause he makes the book scary.
I think it would work really great with a two-part movie that catches the essence of It. But it seems like the project is stalled?
I haven't heard anything new about it for a while. Is it still a project?
Finally, someone who gets what the whole thing actually is about.
shareThis is one instance I'm all for a sequel, providing it is handled correctly and truer to the novel.
The 1990 mini-series was a second rate 'B-movie' type outing with hammy acting, cheap effects and did the novel little justice. Tim Curry's performance was one of the few saving grace's. Knowing that the new Pennywise actor (as and when the remake is actually made) is highly unlikely to match Curry's take is always going to be a downer.
There isn't really a classic to ruin. I agree that truly classic movies should be left alone in the pages of history, but this just isn't one of them.
You talking book or cheap TV-thingy' from 1990?
share