MovieChat Forums > Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989) Discussion > When you first saw the sacrifice scene i...

When you first saw the sacrifice scene in Temple of Doom...


Did you ever imagine that one day the franchise would be reduced to Mickey Mouse jokes? Honestly the thought never crossed my mind but here we are.

reply

Are you talking about SW TLJ ;) ?

reply

While TLJ totally sucked I am referring to the Mickey Mouse joke in Last Crusade

reply

You are so correct! I completely forgot about it. But I kinda found it funny when I watched it for the first time. And the whole cinema was laughing too then. But yes, there were better jokes :) .

reply

There is no Mickey Mouse joke in the Last Crusade. The name "Mickey Mouse" was mentioned, once, but not as a joke. The joke was that Indy tried to pass himself off as a Scottish lord, and that he failed so miserably the best option was just to knock out the manservant. There are exactly two things in there played for jokes:

1. The beret and the bad Scottish accent
2. "How dare he?" [BIFF!]

And that's it. Tell me, if they had kept Jesse Owens, instead of replacing it with Mickey Mouse, would you then complain that "it was all about Jesse Owens jokes"? You wouldn't, would you, even though that would not alter the humour in that scene one bit.

reply

Personally I don’t think there should have been a joke at all but Jesse Owens at least would require the viewer to know a little bit about history and would have been relevant for the times. It was changed to Mickey Mouse because the four year olds this film was made for would know who that was.

Even ET which was made for kids/families was a more mature film that Last Crusade

reply

I dont quite agree with that. I think Mickey Mouse was a more internationally friendly joke. A lot of non Americans have no idea who Jesse Owens is either.

reply

"The Temple of Doom" has just as many stupid jokes as "The Last Crusade." The difference is for 20 minutes in the middle "Temple" abandons its humor and becomes an unrelenting exercise in sadism: children tortured, children begging to die, the skins of people used as decorations, severed arms used as decorations, Indy tortured and drugged, Short tortured and slapped around by Indy ... its bleakness becomes something out of "Schindler's List," which is odd since we're suppose to be watching "light" entertainment here (it makes for fascinating viewing all the same). Of course, once Indy is freed from the black sleep, "Temple" abandons its dark tone and returns to being every bit the action/comedy that "Last Crusade" is. So this assertion that "Temple" is so much grittier than "Last Crusade" only holds true if you're referencing its middle 20 minutes.

reply

Temple might be close to the same humor level as TLC but it at least has originality to it. TLC, is basically a watered down, comedy version of Raiders.

reply

"Temple" owes a lot to "Gunga Din" though because that predated the "Indy" era by about 45 years whereas "Raiders," a film "The Last Crusade" draws a lot of its inspiration from, was made several years prior to the third film's release, it's understandable "Temple" would be construed as the more original one. I'll certainly say this about "Temple": its more metal, with its child slavery and heart snatching, than the adult contemporary-feeling "Crusade."

reply

Im talking about within the quadrilogy itself. If you really want to split hairs about originality, every Indy film owes a lot to "Secret of the Incas", right down to Charlton Heston´s costume.

reply

Good point.

reply

It may have had a single line like that, but Crusade is chock full of adult humour and innuendo and is definitely the most mature of all the Indy movies, especially because it does not take itself too seriously.

It is actually Temple of Doom which is the most "reduced" movie out of the three, as it has endless scenes of gross out humour. It even has a child as a comedic "slapstick" sidekick. It's pretty juvenile despite it has some "dark" scenes. Those scenes, which are very over the top, does not eliminate the slapstick and the gross out humour.

But opinions are divided, there's no real factual "right" opinion and Crusade has a higher tomatometer score and a much higher audience score on Rotten Tomatoes. So many people surely disagree with you.

reply

What adult humor? Crusade was nothing more than slapstick violence and kiddie humor. It was the most immature out of all of them but the worst part about it is very simple: It's boring. John Williams score especially really killed it for me.

Temple was an intense action ride from the minute we get into the temple. The Thuggee Cult is more than a legitimate threat and the intense scenes of action along with the increased level of violence and gore (not gross out humor) makes it a very mature film along with Raiders. The problem is after Temple parents complained that it was too intense for children (and again I ask did they even see the first movie?) so Spielberg pussed out and made a kiddie film for Last Crusade. If he was going to tone down the violence and the adult themes I might be able to get past it if it was at least interesting but it wasn't. For the life of me I cannot understand why people seem to like this film.

reply

SpaceAce2001, The movie isn't mature just because it has violence, and as you mention the violence of Last Crusade it also seems like you don't mind contradicting yourself. The humour in Doom is just completely juvenile bordering on fart jokes, which is something the other two didn't have. In fact, Last Crusade is far more similar to Raiders of the Lost Ark, while Doom is the odd man out, seemingly very unfocused, with the way it goes from gross out humour to death by heart ripping, and how it includes a child sidekick (who has some stupid slapstick fighting during supposedly intense Indy scenes) in a child friendly manner despite the violence. It's an uneven, unfocused movie. It is rightly considered the weakest by most people (of the three original movies).

And to that question you asked, "what adult humour?" Well, pretty much anything involving the dialogue between Indy and his dad, for starters. One of the main differences between this and Doom is exactly that they dropped the juvenile humour of the second movie, and put a lot of the humour in the dialogue (instead of gross out and slapstick in the second) or can you give some substantial examples of this "kiddie humour" in Crusade?

I can only repeat what I wrote to the TheUltimateHippo: But opinions are divided, there's no real factual "right" opinion and Crusade has a higher tomatometer score and a much higher audience score on Rotten Tomatoes. So many people surely disagree with you.

reply

It’s not just the violence , temple deals with a very mature subject matter while Crusade is just some stupid campy kiddie film. You seem to just be cherry picking the few silly parts of Temple while ignoring the intense adventure, the compelling story and the adult themes. There was nothing mature about Crusade, there was nothing mature about Indy and Henry, nothing much was every freshed out between the two except for 2 minutes on the blimp and that went absolutely nowhere, Ford and Connery also have zero chemistry which is a shame because they are two great actors. The main difference between temple and Crusade is that temple was about the thuggee cult and saving the children and restoring the stone to its rightful place, the comic relief was secondary. Crusade on the other hand didn’t seem to care about a story or compelling character development, it was about Jar Jar antics and Mickey Mouse jokes. What little story there was was a rehash of raiders just Crusade took all of the fun and excitement of raiders and sucked it right out. I hate this movie so much.

By the way I am the ultimate hippo

reply

So fuck you for having more than one user, and good bye.

reply

My account got blocked moron and I didn’t even try to hide it. I am however glad that you concede. Good day

reply