I don't think the postings online were sick. It sounded to me like he was dropping clues. I heard that he asked "How long are you going to keep looking for your son", then apologized and asked if he could write a poem for the family, which he never did. Here were the quotes:
“how long are you planing (sic) to look for your son?” (I think this is the posting he apologized for, which makes me think he didn't mean it in a nasty way. Otherwise, why even bother apologizing?)
And in regards to writing a poem for the family:
“It would be cool if I could but if you dont want me to I can understan why I guess … ,'’
That's all I heard. I didn't hear about any more messages. You'd think, if he really wanted to taunt his family, he could have posted a whole lot more. However, if he was trying to drop clues, he might have been hesitant for fear of what might happen if he ever escaped Devlin. Or that Devlin would check his online activity. We don't know what Shawn was threatened with.
It seems only logical that a man who would pull off an abduction so brazen as Ben's would have had experience doing the same thing in the past with other boys, like Shawn. Certainly anyone who would take an eleven year old boy away from his family, whether through bribery or threats or both, is a very dangerous, sick person who is capable of only God knows what. Shawn was only eleven so there's no way he could be held responsible. What Devlin committed was a heinous crime, no matter how you look at it. And the one person who knew about this secret was an eleven year old. An eleven year old perfect stranger he snatched off the street. Even if he met him online beforehand, and befriended him there, I doubt "friendship's" enough to have kept a boy that young away from his family for four years. Let's not forget, we don't know what went on in that apartment, but it was probably not good.
Oh yeah, and I heard the internet theory of yours was explored already. They got nothing...
reply
share