MovieChat Forums > Twins (1988) Discussion > Is there really a need to have Twins 2

Is there really a need to have Twins 2

posted 13 years ago by stwrtmaganga
41 replies | jump to latest

I really don't see the point for there to be Twins 2. This is just simply a ploy to revive Eddie Murphy's career. What do you think?

[–] rateater (10076) 4 years ago

with the beautiful kelly preston gone i'd say maybe give it a rest.

[–] Moonglum9 (11311) 4 years ago

Only if they call it 2wins

[–] Sparky123 (1680) 4 years ago

Not if it's anything like coming 2 America.

[–] PaladinNJ (21529) 4 years ago

I thought that was canned.

[–] Sparky123 (1680) 4 years ago

Hopefully.

[–] Cognoscente (2664) 4 years ago

I'm glad that it never happened because then it would have been titled Twice the Twins.

[–] huwdj (4567) 4 years ago

They could have had the guys seemingly falling for the same woman but it was actually another set of twins. Then they could call it Twins Two!
Geddit? - I'll get my coat.

[–] Corbell (10995) 4 years ago

That would/could have been a good sub plot, not enough by itself.

[–] Cognoscente (2664) 3 years ago

Unless one twin was good while the other was bad.

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 4 years ago

Perhaps they could just call it Four.

[–] TMC-4 (20185) a year ago

How Twins 2 Movie Plans Were Spoiled By Arnold Schwarzenegger According To Danny DeVito

https://screenrant.com/twins-2-movie-arnold-schwarzenegger-danny-devito-cancelled-reason/

Danny DeVito reveals how co-star Arnold Schwarzenegger's big plans for life beyond Hollywood ruined their chance to make Twins 2 happen.

[–] einstein (2570) 7 months ago

they are twins.they always come in 2 hahaa