Actually, I disagree with some of that, since it depends heavily on even more assumptions than a simpler explanation does. There's just not enough detail given in the flick to firmly support some implications, & in a case like that Occam's Razor is usually the best rule of thumb -- all other things being equal, go with the simplest explanation.
Example -- Early in the film we're shown repeatedly that Roberto had admiration, at times even gushing adoration for actors (even being just as mercurial himself as they're sometimes known for). Consequently when things go suddenly & fatally south for him, it's not at all surprising that his attitude would flip just as instantaneously. Also, when the staff are discussing how to handle the situation, they appear surprised & don't act at all as though they're used to this as even semi-routine.
The conversational things like Roberto's dying comment seem to be just for that moment, not particularly for solid tie-in to anything specifically previous or following. It may make for headaches & frustration for those who feel continuity is ne plus ultra, but for those who feel that excruciating precision & exactitude get in the way of the flick's purpose as entertainment, the way it is is probably "good enough." :)
reply
share