Was Nancy's death necessary?


I don't think so, still don't understand why it happened.

reply

Dramatically it works well.

Did I like it? I still remember my sister laughing at me when I screamed "Noooo"! So personally no it wasn't nessecary because Nancy owned.

However, it did seem nessecary for the series continue. Sometimes people are destined to die, doesn't mean we have to like it. Fate is a bitch.

Besides, I'd rather have 2 Nancy films (1 Heather film technically) rather than her returning to a lackluster story and over staying her welcome.

What I don't accept is her falling for Freddy's trick! There is absolutely no way the Nancy from the first would ever buy that crap. Russel and Darabont didn't seem to really grasp her character very much.

Her death in Craven's original draft was much better. She still dies, but she knows it's a con from Freddy.

In fact, her entire character in that draft is much more "Nancyish". She tougher, smarter, and feisty unlike the film's passive approach to her character.

reply

I don't see Nancy being weak for falling for Freddy's trick, but Freddy doing what he does best: plays up the weaknesses of people to get in close for the kill. He's a character that literally likes to twist the knife because that's how he gets his kicks. Also keep in mind that Nancy's dad floats in and says 'before I go,' hinting to Nancy that he was just able to bury the remains and was possibly ascending to heaven in the process. So not only was Nancy finally getting her wish of making amends, it was her last chance to say goodbye...and then she gets gutted.

And in a way, she had to die with this one. Up until this point, nobody fought Krueger and lived to tell the tale. Nancy was the sole survivor of her friends in the first movie, nobody survived the second, and the big thing about the this movie was that '...and now they're ready!' Joey, Kincaid, and Kristen were going to live. But Nancy was the outlier, and her death still meant that Freddy had some power going forward. Let's not forget that unless you take 'Freddy's Dead' with a grain of salt, there are no survivors in the entirety of the first six films except the three at the end of Part 6.

reply

It wasn't necessary but it's very shocking and emotional. I was shocked the first time I watched this film because I never would've expected Nancy to die. I thought for sure she was going to remain triumphant and continue to fight Freddy just like in Part 1. So when she died it was shocking and sad. I can't imagine anyone watching the movie and not feeling anything because you root for her. She did lots of good and helped a lot of people.

So while she didn't have to die it was a big shock and one of the most important deaths of the series.

reply

It's one of the deaths that you don't see coming-- and it leaves you pretty saddened. Was it necessary? Yes, for dramatic effect, but you hate to see a beloved character like her die.

reply

I don't know if it was or not, but honestly I still hated Nancy died though. I was actually just thinking this morning how, after Freddy and despite only being in two movies, she sort of seems like the series' central character. At least for me.

reply

I can deal with her dying but she got one of the lamest deaths in movie history.

reply

I disagree. Her death was emotional and a huge gut to the heart for me the first time I watched it. Definitely one of the better m, and respectful character deaths. At least she didn't die in the opening.

reply

[deleted]

I really didn't care for the way the dumbed her character down for her death on one hand, but at least they didn't turn her death into a punchline or go the over the top route and turn her into a roach or motorcycle.

reply

i thought it fit the film.. she sacrificed herself for the greater good.
so did her father.

r.i.p.

reply