MovieChat Forums > Near Dark (1988) Discussion > Did not age well but ripe for a re-make

Did not age well but ripe for a re-make


Okay, the cast is still fun to watch. Henrikson's Jesse and Paxton's Severen pretty much steal the show and it would have been cool to see a prequel/sequel with just these two characters.

But the pacing is painfully slow by today's standards and the plot has some big disconnects. The music gives away its 80s origins, but, that said, it's still haunting.

Director Bigelow pays tribute to her future husband James Cameron when we see a movie theatre in the background with 'Aliens' on the marquee. The in-joke is that three of the cast members from that movie were in Near Dark at the suggestion of Cameron.

Later in the movie though is a scene were Paxton's Severen is hit by a transport truck. We think he's dead, but then he pops up at the front of the truck, face split open, and crawls over the hood to reach Caleb in the cab. Minutes later the truck crashes and explodes into flames.

I've never read or seen it mentioned before but this is another Cameron nod, in this case, The Terminator which features a near identical scene with Schwarneggar toward the end. (That movie also featured Paxton in a brief bit.)

reply

I don't know about a remake, but I would enjoy seeing more working class vampire stories.

reply

A lot of the critical love for this movie comes from its supposed melding of the vampire and the Western genre. It's a bit of stretch to call this a Western... sure it takes place in a Western setting and there's lots of cowboy hats about, but that doesn't make it a Western / horror mashup, IMO.

Did u see Bone Tomahawk (Kurt Russell)? Now THERE's a recent movie that mashed up up Western and horror very well. It's on Netflix.




reply

I know of only one other vampire movie that never once uses the word “vampire,” and that is Byzantium. Byzantium is the best vampire movie I ever expect to see. Near Dark is the second best. There is no need for a remake, any more than there’s a need for a rewrite of Beethoven’s 7th Symphony. What IS needed is original, new material. New for the sake of new is creatively bankrupt; witness Arnie’s Conan versus the remake, witness The Last Starfighter versus whatever the impending remake turns out to be. A photocopy is not as crisp as the original. Near Dark as aged just fine.

reply

Agreed. No remake really needed. In my experience, worthy remakes are rare.

Carpenter's 'The Thing', Friedken's 'Sorcerer' (Wages of Fear) and Cohen Brothers' 'True Grit' to name a few.

Horror Westerns are scarce too. These aren't quite up there with Bone Tomahawk, but are maybe worth mentioning.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0445939/?ref_=nv_sr_1

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0377749/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Byzantium added to watchlist, thanks.


reply

Directed by Neil Jordan, starring Saiorsce Ronan. It is more than worth your time to see. I hope that you enjoy it.

Neil Jordan has directed the best werewolf movie that I ever expect to see, The Company of Wolves, and also the best vampire film, Byzantium. Both
are quite unusual.

reply

Watched Byzantium the other day. I think I like it a bit better than Near Dark. For me, the Tangerine Dream soundtrack lends more atmosphere to Near Dark, but Byzantium somehow seems to be more 'immersive'.
Now, I'll have to watch The Company of Wolves.
Thank you.

reply

Entirely my pleasure. I am truly enthusiastic about werewolf movies, and have been since I was a little boy. There are so few good ones. I am not nearly as excited about vampire films. I think that I resent that they are more popular than the werewolf category. I think that’s due to their Victorian-era-inspired of the fangs penetrating the (almost always) woman
victim as a metaphor for coitus where the woman
was absolved of sin because she was “helpless,” so she could lay back and enjoy herself. For example, the HBO series, True Blood. Be that as it may, Jordan seems to
have a lock on both mythical yet Jungian-archetypal beasties. I hope you enjoy The Company of Wolves. It’s not horror. It’s myth and legend, and it has a wonderful cast. Keep your eyes peeled for a cameo by Terrance Stamp.

reply

The Burrowers... yes, I did see this, quite liked it. Have not heard of Dead Birds but will check it out.

reply

I haven't heard of Byzantium, but I'll search it out.

As far as a re-make, I use that term loosely. I'd like to see a good vampire movie that truly melds vampires and Westerns, maybe one actually set in the late 1800s.

In Near Dark, we learn that Jesse is a Confederate War vet... so maybe a prequel with just his character set in the 1880s. Sadly, Lance Henrikson is too old to play the part and I can't think of any current actor who could convincingly convey menace in that unique Henrikson way.

Have u seen Vamp, another 80s vampire flick that sort of flew under the radar? It's a weird melange of comedy, urban paranoia and horror... Grace Jones was perfect in the lead role. She's always had this weird unearthly persona so this role was made for her.

reply

We have Tru Blood, with Vampire Bill as a proud son of the South. The USA Southland seems to be a hotbed for spawning vamps, doesn’t it? New England (my adopted home!) is a haven for covens cravin’ a life of witchcraft.

reply

Tru Blood... totally forgot about that show. Watched about half the first season... not sure why we gave up on it. Maybe the story was too slow to get going, can't remember. At least it was different from the Euro-trash vampires of Underworld, or the angsty teen / YA vampires of the Twilight Movies and The Vampire Diaries...

reply

You may have tossed in the towel because True Blood is a soap opera driven by, as are all soap operas, socially-acceptable metaphors for sex, which also describes almost all vampire movies (“I vant to suck your blood!”) except for Byzantium (which has plenty of sex, but not of the typical vamp-flick irresistible-penetration kind) and Near Dark, where the vamps were clearly about getting dinner and not about getting off.

reply