I thought this was supposed to be a classic highly rated horror film. I was interested in seeing the Pinhead guy in the movie too but he barely was even in the movie. The plot was absolutely ridiculous. A lot of plot holes. It did have good graphics for the 80's but that's about it. It had potential. It was a waste of my 90 minutes!
I don't find it to be a disturbing movie, or a particularly good movie. Mostly a 5/10 time killer. But I don't recall any particular plot holes (and no, just because they left some stuff unexplained doesn't make those things plot holes).
But the OP gave Sister Act 2 a 10, so, yeah.
-----
WORDS MEAN THINGS! Also, before you come to bitch about a plot hole, rewatch the show/movie.
[deleted]
It wasn't nearly as "scary" as I've been led to believe, but I still enjoyed it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAIJ3Rh5Qxs
I didn't know that Hellraiser was ever considered to be "scary". Gross? Yes. Disturbing in ways for it's time? Yes. Scary? No.
- - - - - - -
I am not a fan. I just happen to enjoy movies. Fans are embarrassing.
I don't think it was a waste of time at all. The first time I saw it I wished there was more Pinhead but then I realized the rest of the film was so great that it didn't really bother me. Besides, it just made it feel more special when he was onscreen. I also thought the plot was well written and very imaginative. It felt so fresh and original that I can't think of any other films like it. I love this movie and am sorry to hear you didn't have the same experience I did.
shareFor me, it was the waste beyond repair. Yes, I watched it, and will NEVER again!!
shareyou clearly have *beep* taste in movies, if you gave cabin in the woods a 3 and Shazam haha *beep* shazam an 8, and there were no plot holes, maybe you should've paid more attention. asshat.
shareFACT
share