only 7.5
Not only does this deserve to be in the imdb 250 it should have a higher rating, anyone else really shocked about that.
shareNot only does this deserve to be in the imdb 250 it should have a higher rating, anyone else really shocked about that.
shareYes I am, this was an excellent movie and very underrated. If you look at the voting process that IMDB uses it will have wide range of age groups and that can explain some of the movie ratings, most of the voters were in the 18-29 range.
i think the whole rating system must be flawed, theirs so many movies in the top 250 that dont deserve and vica versa with loads not in it that deserve.
sharenm
sharethe historical inaccuracies shown in the movie are what keep this movie from being better rated in my opinion, stone should have done way more research and show things how they really happened, and for those who say *beep* like that still goes on in el salvador youre wrong
Everything we say is our opinion, respect mine and I shall respect yours
^^That^^ and some people have got *beep* taste in movies and can't be bothered watching anything with much subject matter.
"A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti."
[deleted]
I think the rating is too high...
______________
http://mulhollandcinelog.wordpress.com/
Why? What are your favourite films?
shareThe movie was not wildly popular, its politics was abrasive and at odds with the foreign policy of the Reagan administration its always going to divide opinion.
Its that man again!!
Well I just watched it and rated it 10 so that should help
Woods is amazing in it. My second favourite Woods film now, just behind THE HARD WAY
What I find troubling is the number of people who have rated this movie. That alone shows how many people HAVE NOT seen this movie. For me, this is required viewing. One of James Woods best performances. Belushi wasn't so bad either.
share