It's a good movie, but I don't think it was that great, really.
Maybe it's because I watched it the day after I watched Psycho II, but it just felt like it dragged on for way to long, and I was just waiting for Norman to snap and kill someone so I could get into it. The slow pace build up of the first two worked, but it just seemed a bit to much in this one.
Also it really bugged me that the lady who was there bothering Norman about writing an article or whatever it was about murderers claiming insanity didn't get killed at the end. She was really the only person from all of the Psycho movies I wanted to get killed off, but it never happened. Oh well.
However, I will say that I liked was Perkins did with the movie overall. As someone else mentioned, I got a kick out of seeing Mary's book laying outside the house (with the ever appropriate title, in(?) the belly of the beast), although I probably would of missed it if I hadn't seen Psycho II the night before.
Overall I'd say it's a good movie and a worthy sequel, but compared to Psycho I/II, it just didn't live up to the title. However, I will say that Perkins nailed the humor in this one.
reply
share