MovieChat Forums > 52 Pick-Up (1986) Discussion > How would Scheider's character explain h...

How would Scheider's character explain his car?

posted 9 years ago by qfal
6 replies | jump to latest

His car explodes and has a dead person in it and he thinks that won't be a problem?

[–] owlfy 9 years ago

The whole plot was fairly absurd. That isn't the only questionable part.

[–] yatzo376 9 years ago

Hey, nothing made sense in the 80s.

"You work your side of the street, and I'll work mine"

[–] R_Kane (15828) 5 years ago

It all did, if you were alive then. Shoulder pads is haute couture dresses? President Ron? Big hair? If you can make sense of that, you can make sense of anything.

[–] DmitriKnipper (204) 4 years ago

Um, report it stolen? Man, you millennials need everything spelled out for you. ;)

[–] KBiker (1079) 4 years ago

I thought the same thing as Roy walks off with his wife while the car is burning behind them. But then, it was just one in a string of absurdities in this movie.

BTW, someone suggested he just report his car stolen. That makes no sense either. So his car is stolen and is then blown up on an abandoned bridge to San Pedro. The cop are just going to buy that, right?

[–] kwestmo (4385) 4 years ago

The cops may not buy it, but they would have to prove this absurd scheme. Or just accept a known scumbag died in a car he stole.