On Siskel and Ebert's "The worst of 1991" show, they mentioned how aweful the movie Highlander 2's title was AGAIN. My question is, why do they hate that title so much? Is there a meaning "highlander" has that I am unaware of?
___________
If you love Jesus Christ and are 100%
proud of it copy this and make your signature!
Try looking at http://www.siskelandebert.org their review on it, but please keep in mind they might have hated it just like a lot of movie critics did. When a movie critic reviews a movie, it doesn't make it a good or bad movie it is just their opinion. Like in 1994 I would think a lot of critics gave bad reviews to the movie North, but does that make it a bad movie no that is just their opinion. They are right or wrong if a movie is good or bad, it is just what they think of the movie. And they might not enjoy it as much as you or I but I am sure it just had parts that they just hated.
shareMaybe because it had nothing to do with the film? I have no idea since I've never seen the film. I've read Roger's review of Highlander 2 and I can see how bad it is.
highlander two sucked big time but is it the worse film of 91? I think manaquin 2 was worse film of 91 that was a dreadful stupid waste of time.problem child two was worse as well.
Yoda Rules!
Mannequin 2..God what a mess!
I think Highlander 2 had such high expectations and when people saw it veered so far from the original(and was so awful to boot) they considered it the worst movie of the year without taking into consideration the Mannequin 2's of that same year.
Shall we play a game?
They didn't see those films.
shareBecause it sounds funny, it's cumbersome, and it doesn't make any sense.
shareI'm pretty sure they were making fun of the subtitle: "The Quickening".
share