Holes in Story
How did they find John Book on the Lapp farm ?
Who killed his partner ?
When Book kicked the crap out of the bullies/rubes, the townsfolk relayed the story to the sheriff and told him the stranger was staying with old Eli Lapp. Since the sheriff had already talked to Book's lieutenant by phone, he knew Book was a wanted man, and this story of the "Ohio" Amish man who kicked the beejeezus out of the thugs tipped him off that this stranger was likely John Book. He phoned Lieutenant Schaeffer and they guessed correctly that it was Book hiding on the Lapp farm.
It is bad to drink Jobus rum. Very bad.share
This is incorrect. I just watched the movie and the scene with the bullies occurs AFTER Schaefer tells Book that they already know where he is. They learned it from Book's partner Carter, whom they then killed.
So to answer the OPs questions, Schaefer learns where Book is from Carter. Schaefer then had Carter killed.
This is incorrect. I just watched the movie and the scene with the bullies occurs AFTER Schaefer tells Book that they already know where he is. They learned it from Book's partner Carter, whom they then killed.
Is very bad to steal Jobu's rum. Is very bad.share
Sorry, but this is still incorrect. I just re-watched the movie. Here's the sequence of events:
Schaeffer talks to Carter and says "we know you know where he is." The scene ends without us learning whether or not Carter gives Book's location up.
Book goes to call Carter, learns that Carter has been killed. Book (correctly) assumes Schaeffer was behind Carter's death. He calls Schaeffer at home. During this conversation, Schaeffer tells Book, "We know where you are. We're about to..." Book cuts him off but this implies that Schaeffer and his men are "about to" come out to get him because he just said, "We know where you are."
THEN, the bully scene happens.
So to me the implication is not that the sheriff called Schaeffer, but because of the sequence of events and the dialogue, Carter told Schaeffer Book's location before they killed him. Perhaps he was tortured, or they threatened his loved ones. Hence, Schaeffer tells Book "We know where you are. We're about to..." BEFORE the Sheriff could have ever called Schaeffer.
Your sequence is correct as it was before, but you're making suppositions where no scene supports it.
If you're thinking the phone call scene is it, it's not. Book caught Schaeffer off guard by calling him at home, so he blustered about knowing where Book was and tried to put him back on the defensive by telling him that they were coming to get him.
Schaeffer only knew Book was in Pennsylvania, not his exact location.
Sgt. Carter did not know any more about Book's location than Schaeffer did.
Carter was killed because Schaeffer and McFee correctly assumed he knew that they were involved in the drug deal as well as having the other cop killed in the rest room. They were afraid he was going to call the FBI or otherwise expose them, and since that was a plan that was on the table right before Carter was killed, they were right. In any case, leave no witnesses.
Lastly, why would they film the scene the where the old timer flagged down and talked to the sheriff if not to show us Book's cover was blown?
Is very bad to steal Jobu's rum. Is very bad.share
"you're making suppositions where no scene supports it."
Likewise. There is no scene showing the sheriff contacting Schaeffer. Nor is there a scene where the motivation for Carter's murder is revealed. So I have to go by what IS shown...Schaeffer tells Book "We know where you are" before the bully scene, thus negating the theory that the sheriff is the source of that information.
Since the sheriff had already talked to Book's lieutenant by phone, he knew Book was a wanted man, and this story of the "Ohio" Amish man who kicked the beejeezus out of the thugs tipped him off that this stranger was likely John Book.
LOL! Thanks for the citations. I didn't think to do that, but really, it wouldn't have mattered even if I had posted those in my reply to the above dissenter.
"BrianRaess..." is either a troll or he's one of those internet creeps who will refuse to concede a discussion no matter how wrong he is. Replying again to him would lead to an endless regurgitation of the same argument. I'm sorry I responded to him after my first post really..
Is very bad to steal Jobu's rum. Is very bad.share
Bit unfair to call him a troll or internet creep. I happen to agree with your description of events (and thought it was pretty obvious, really), but it's not like he didn't put forward a reasonable argument for an alternative interpretation.
shareYeah, you clearly see someone communicate with a policeman after Book attacks the mean tourists. As the movie earlier showed Schaefer and others talking with the local police, the only logical conclusion is that the police told this story to Schaefer, who then put 2 and 2 together.
share