Ewagner-1 wrote,
>Since both of the assumptions are incorrect, the questions are moot.
I am unclear here. Presuming the two “assumptions” are the OP's framing of her/his questions, why are they incorrect and why are the questions moot?
>No one actually says the explosives will go off, only that
>it would be unsafe for the humans to drive further.
I concur, mostly. I went back and watched that scene over. As close as it comes is Api asking, “Are we safe enough here?” and Zac replying, “Yeah, I think so.”
There isn't any confirmation of the exact nature of the danger that the ionizing radiation poses. That it is directly lethal to the human body or indirectly via impacting the explosives are both plausible takes. All we know is that it unsafe to precede further, that it is like “driving into a microwave oven.”
With that said, radiation impacting explosives is a common fear, and the OP's first question is about how Zac was able to safely drive the truck to the satellite array. That is a reasonable question, not irrelevant.
Such a question could be answered by saying that the radiation would not really impact the explosives, and its impact on the body would not be immediate. Neither would be enough to prevent Zac's driving.
>And we can't assume that the effect that occurred as Zac drove
>the truck was the final effect or just another tremor, not that it
> mattered, since he set off the bomb anyway.
>Zac may have predicted the event wrong,
Fair enough, Zac may have predicted the event wrong. I have two problems with that assertion: In terms of the film, Zac is our inside expert, and the story events seem to fit his prediction. For example, his calculations say that the effect will occur “tomorrow morning.” The dawn is clearly breaking at the end when Zac blows up the truck.
Zac may not have been able to pinpoint when in the morning the effect would take place, but whether it was the “final effect or just another tremor” is a moot point, like you wrote, “not that it mattered.”
>He was certainly always going to sacrifice himself, and for the
>same reasons he tried to commit suicide in the beginning.
I don't believe that he was “always going to sacrifice himself.” I don't think he made that decision until Joanne opted to go with Api after they stopped at the bridge. That makes for Joanne's symbolic choice between the two men. I think that was the point of Zac's mournful look and distant stare when the two drove off together.
>He felt responsible.
Agreed, and I'd add that he did not want to be responsible for what a second effect might do, particularly to Joanne and Api.
reply
share