Did they really need Spock's body?
Why not just take Bones to Vulcan and say "Hey, we found Spock's Katra. Good enough?".
"Live long and suck it, Zachary Quinto!"
Why not just take Bones to Vulcan and say "Hey, we found Spock's Katra. Good enough?".
"Live long and suck it, Zachary Quinto!"
I've always included this as one of the mistakes in the story. The need to go to the Genesis Planet makes no sense, as Sarek never once shows concern over the body, but only the Katra. They find the Katra in McCoy, so how the story suddenly has them going to Genesis is beyond me, except that it is what the plot needs to do to get Spock back. Its a necessary action, but poorly incorporated into the story. It could have easily been fixed with a minute of dialogue where Sarek expresses the need to give Spock's body a proper Vulcan burial or something like that...anything to give Kirk and crew a reason to return to Genesis.
I love the movie, but it isn't without some problems regarding the story.
- - - - - - -
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
And its not like they new that Spock's body had been reanimated.
"Live long and suck it, Zachary Quinto!"
Right. It was all convenient plot points designed to get Spock to us again, but not logically incorporated. It's kind of like Star Trek Generations where we have things happening for no other reason than to get Kirk and Picard together, not because they truly make sense. They had a good idea for the resurrection of Spock here, but the story needed a couple of rewrites to better smooth out these ideas and make it flow more logically rather than just being the result of the need to have Spock back at the end.
- - - - - - -
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
IMO it's similar to the convenience of Spock on Genesis, being aged back to pretty much what he was before he made the ultimate sacrifice.
Still, I'm happy to run with that.
When Sarek asks Kirk why he left Spock on Genesis at his apartment, he's implying that Kirk should have known (which he would have had been carried the katra) that Spock's body should have been returned to Vulcan. McCoy, as the keeper of the katra, does say to Kirk in Spock's quarters "You left me on Genesis. Why did you do that?" Sarek also says that Kirk must bring McCoy and Spock to Vulcan so they "can both find peace." He was definitely speaking literally.
Probably for the same reason that Vulcans need to return home during pon farr, some kind of deep connection to their homeworld, perhaps. As Sarek says in the film, "It's the Vulcan way."
Sucks for the crew of the Intrepid, none of whose bodies or katras made it back to Vulcan.
Did they ship Commander Sonak's remains back to Vulcan (in a ziploc)?
"Live long and suck it, Zachary Quinto!"
When Sarek asks Kirk why he left Spock on Genesis at his apartment, he's implying that Kirk should have known (which he would have had been carried the katra) that Spock's body should have been returned to Vulcan.
When Sarek asks Kirk why he left Spock on Genesis at his apartment, he's implying that Kirk should have known (which he would have had been carried the katra) that Spock's body should have been returned to Vulcan.
Sarek also says that Kirk must bring McCoy and Spock to Vulcan so they "can both find peace." He was definitely speaking literally
Sarek says placing one's katra in another person is the Vulcan way when the body's end is near, which makes it sound like it is a fairly common event in Vulcan culture. But at the end of the movie, the Vulcan high priestess says the refusion of body and katra hadn't been done in ages passed, and even then, it was only legend. So I'm a bit confused by this.
share