So was the whole movie a dream?
Was it?
Keep in mind I haven't seen any of the sequels so if they answered that question in the sequels I wouldn't know.
Was it?
Keep in mind I haven't seen any of the sequels so if they answered that question in the sequels I wouldn't know.
No. It's that Freddy tricked her into thinking she was awake but she wasn't. He did bring her mom into her dream and killed her. Nancy survived and is in part 3.
shareSo then when Nancy pulled Freddy back into "reality" it was really a dream right? Then at the end everyone he killed earlier came back because they never died because it was all a dream and Freddy was still screwing with them.
I don't agree. Those people died and the end is just Freddy mentally screwing with Nancy.
shareSo then when she pulled him out was she still dreaming or was that reality?
shareWhen she pulled him out she was still dreaming. And she was still dreaming at the end. But the whole movie was not just a dream. At least not with the ending the original movie had. Wes Craven wanted the entire movie to be a stupid dream. I myself hate that ending and don't blame the studios for changing the ending to leave room for sequels. Personally I prefer the ending the movie ended up with. I hate the idea of Freddy just being a figment of some girl's imagination.
shareWell she pulled him into the level that she was in the entire movie so that would mean the whole movie was a dream.
shareNo it doesn't. She just never woke up. But that doesn't mean the entire movie is a dream. The entire movie happened. Just that the last 20 minutes was a dream. Plus like I said if you take the sequels into account Nancy survives and is later killed by Freddy years later after helping some other kids battle him in their dreams. The ending just means Nancy lost. She never brought Freddy into the real world and therefore didn't beat Freddy. It's a tragic ending with the bad guy winning.
shareSo then she never pulled Freddy out? So Freddy just disappeared and made her think she defeated him to mess with her?
shareWhat the heck do you mean? I don't get how you could think Freddy disappeared when he's clearly shown to still be there at the end. He was there at the end and made the car she and her friends were in go out of control. And then just for fun pulled Nancy's mom through the door window. He didn't disappear. My take on that is that Nancy knew she was still asleep and then tried to defeat Freddy by saying she wasn't scared of him. Then she tried to control her dream to make it happier. But then it turns out Freddy wasn't defeated and he did the things I just said.
If that's not the ending you watched you must've watched some fan made cut that had the ending Wes Craven wanted where the entire movie was just a stupid dream and Nancy lives happily ever after with her friends who never died. But that certainly isn't the original ending everyone had seen for years in theaters and on VHS and DVD.
Ok It appears Nancy pulls Freddy out of her dream, then they have a little chase through the house and Freddy gets hit with a sledge hammer , set on fire, etc. then Nancy decides she isn’t afraid of him anymore, walks away and Freddy vanishes. Then we have the last scene where all the characters are back and get in the car only to have it turn out Freddy is still around, are both of these sequences dreams? If the booby trap chase scene was a dream that would suggest the whole movie was a dream because Nancy is in the same level as she was the rest of the movie or did she never pull Freddy out. The only way your premise would work would be if Freddy just tricked her into thinking she pulled him out
shareDid you not read my previous post? I said Freddy tricked her into thinking she was in the real world but she wasn't.
Also funilly enough, the alternate ending Wes Craven wanted but was forced to change, that has Nancy living happily ever after does have the girls jumping rope singing the 1, 2 Freddy's coming for you as well. Which seems contradictory if he intended the final scene take place in the real world.
So then when she brought Freddy back was that the same level she had been in the entire movie? You aren’t answering the question
share"What the heck do you mean? I don't get how you could think Freddy disappeared when he's clearly shown to still be there at the end."
I was thinking the O.P. mean from the end of the movie until Nancy's reappearance in Dream Warriors (because she is pretty shocked when she sees Freddy for the first time). But their original post says they only saw the first one, so that's out the window lol
"What the heck do you mean? I don't get how you could think Freddy disappeared when he's clearly shown to still be there at the end."
I was thinking the O.P. meant from the end of the movie until Nancy's reappearance in Dream Warriors (because she is pretty shocked when she sees Freddy for the first time). But their original post says they only saw the first one, so that's out the window lol
In addition to the above answer, keep in mind, Wes Craven wanted to have a definite ending with Freddy being defeated. The odd final scene was forcefully added by the studio who wanted the movie open ended for possible sequels.
share^ this is what i read as well, making the ending as random as it is.
shareThat’s how I saw it
shareI saw Never Sleep Again and it seems that Wes Craven's intent in 1 was for it all or mostly all to have been a dream (meaning no one died). They also based 3 off of Wes Craven's script and by that point Wes was going with everything up until the Mom being burned in her bed as being real. As a horror fan I would on my own interpret everything up until the mom dying as being real and the part where the Dad goes back downstairs as the start of Nancy finally from exhaustion and beginning to dream. The part where the Dad decides to leave the room feels too surreal to be real imo.
shareIn the movie, the characters experience vivid and often horrifying nightmares, with Freddy Krueger as the main antagonist. These nightmares have real-world consequences, as the teenagers are physically harmed or killed in their sleep. The film explores the concept of dreams becoming a tangible and deadly reality.
The ambiguity surrounding dreams and reality is intentional in "A Nightmare on Elm Street," and the story deliberately blurs the boundaries between the two. It keeps the audience guessing and questioning the nature of the events occurring on screen. The film establishes a dreamlike atmosphere and creates a sense of psychological terror, but it doesn't explicitly reveal the events as merely a dream.
The biggest issue is when does she fall asleep? because between the 'I am your boyfriend now' line with the famous tounge coming out of the phone... that implies that we are in a dream
if that was a dream.. then Glen dies next.. how do you explain the parents finding his body and the cops going into the house. is that suppose to be 'reality' that part because Nancy sees all that as well in her 'dream' and the cops outsdie the house. or is the parents finding Glen and the blood the only 'reality' part of the past 20 mins? and the whole 'Dad give me 20 mins' as well part happens in there.
so either she is dreaming the entire time. or she wakes up after the tounge over the phone. then somehow goes back to sleep again. none of it makes logical sense.
what also doesn't make sense is the sequels how can Nany not dream about Freddy for 'years' and survive if Freddy tricked her to being a dream all along if there wasn't some truth to her making him vanish from her dreams.
my take is everything is all happy till the added scene in the daylight, but that still doesn't explain the phone scene with freddys tounge because that implies it is a dream the entire time.
the way I see it Nany took away Freddy's powers for him to hurt her.. but he also tricked her at the end (the forced scene) that it was still a dream as well that he was alive and still around and will go on killing other kids but just not her because she took away his powers to hurt her in dreams. all up until years later when she decides to take hin on in part 3
I think half the movie is a dream and the other is real life
shareFirst of all I don't know who Nany is
From what I can conclude, Nancy was really tired but awake before Glenn was murdered, she must have doze for a brief moment and the phone/thongue happened but managed to wake up again as she was not into a deep sleep. Then Glenn was murdered and she witnessed all the police and stuff happening outside from her window and called her dad (she was awake) then she fell asleep to bring Freddy to the real world and she did, so she wakes up and Freddy is in the real world, the whole chase and fight happens and Freddy kills her mom by burning her with his body but what confuses me is the way they get engulfed into the bed and then the bed is unscratched? feels like she somehow sleep again during a point in the fight but the dad saw it too and it is confirmed by the 3rd sequel so that might have been something about Freddy being a supernatural even in the real world. The final scene is Nancy dreaming but it might have been any other night, not necesarily the same night, she did defeat Freddy temporarily as she took away his full power by not being afraid of him anymore (something explained in the sequels), that doesn't mean that she would never dream anything at all about him, that was just a 'safe nightmare'.
Nancy didn't dream about Freddy the years after because she was taking Hypnocil which is a dream suppressor, it is showed in part 3.