sadistic and depressing film


Who else thought this film was sugestionally sadistic and depressing ? Why did the major apes have to die in this film ? I remember the scene where Tarzan is playing with his childhood friend " droopy ears " and that moment of felicity is marred by a black panther attacking the poor ape. But the most depressing and sadistic scene of them all was none other than Tarzan's mother's death. This film had a horrible impact on me considering I watched it for the first time at age 15 and I took it really serious. It amazes me how many people find this film attractive while in reality it worships the supreme failure of existence: DEATH.

reply

i take it you dont watch TV...there is more death on gi joe cartoons than this movie.. which showed a fairly acurat portrayal of aditudes about animals back then.

reply

i watched it when i was 4, and its an awesome film. by 15 you should have known , that people die, as do animals in the jungle. panthers eat monkeys and not at KFC.

reply

Hahaha... good reply.

reply

Some monkeys, given the chance, would eat a panther. Don't feel bad for them

reply

That's life in the jungle. Death is always near. The death in this film that made me upset was the Earl's rather silly death from sliding down his staircase.

reply

I agree with the original poster that this was a depressing film. It depressed me anyway. But it presented a depressing truth and I cannot condemn it for that.

As to sadism - well, the original poster should try watching any wildlife documentary. It's kill or be killed, in the jungle or - frequently - in the street. All major species - not just apes - are heading for extinction. And humans are the cause. Within 50 years there probably won't be a single ape left in the wild. And the `wild' will probably have been ploughed-up to serve an agrarian economy or excavated in pursuit of minerals.

Depressing? Sadistic? You ain't seen nothin' yet. Wait till the ice-caps melt.

reply

Animals killing each other is not sadism, neither is human hunters killing animals for food. Now that fat greasy Englishman spanking that little African boy could be called sadism.

reply

Like e.g. no father in the history of mankind has ever spanked their own sons. *rollseyes*. And how do you know what that little African boy had done? Perhaps he earned the spanking.

reply

Go watch some cartoons maybe you will feel better. And don't forget to leave the light on when you go to bed, you never know when Tarzan may come out from the darkness and eat you.

reply

I am confused. I don't mean any disrespect but have you not read the original source material? Every one of the Tarzan novels featured animals killing each other and men killing each other. Burroughs was trying to convey what he felt was an approximation of life in the jungle. And, if you have ever seen a nature documentary you should understand that this is indeed the way it is in the animal (and sometimes the Human) world.

Depressing...maybe...sadistic...does your cat think it's sadistic to eat a mouse? Probably not.

reply

It's a more realistic, less Hollywood romanticized version of the story. Tarzan is a feral child, which sadly are very real.


http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

reply

The scenes with Tarzan in the jungle were hard to watch. When he force fed Ian Holm (sorry don't know the character's name) maggots, I thought I was going to be sick. The best scenes were when Lord Greystoke went to England to see his grandfather. Sir Ralph Richardson was the only reason I watched this.

reply

Maggots, you moron, they were termites/ants.

reply