READ THIS!


Hi Everyone,
I haven't posted here so I am new. But I have been following this case since I was 8 and know alot about it, read the books and have the movie. I just read an article that made me very angry. Here is the link and also the article itself. The jerk might get a new trial!
Tina

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060114/ap_on_re_us/fatal_vision

Court OKs Request in 'Fatal Vision' Case

By STEVE HARTSOE, Associated Press Writer
Fri Jan 13, 8:37 PM ET

RALEIGH, N.C. - An appeals court gave new life Friday to the defense of a former Green Beret doctor convicted of the 1970 murders of his wife and daughters, ruling that his lawyers can introduce evidence that a prosecutor threatened a witness.

A panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., granted a motion by Jeffrey MacDonald's lawyers to present the new evidence in Raleigh federal court. It could result in a new trial, said Hart Miles, one of MacDonald's attorneys.

"I think it's the biggest development in the case since the trial," Miles said.

The defense filed the motion last month, after a former deputy U.S. marshal came forward last year to say he heard a defense witness tell a prosecutor she was in the MacDonald home in Fort Bragg, N.C., on the night of the slayings.

Jimmy B. Britt, part of the security detail during MacDonald's 1979 trial, said he heard prosecutor James Blackburn tell Helena Stoeckley that he would indict her for murder if she told the same story on the witness stand. Stoeckley later testified she could not remember where she was the night of the slayings.

Blackburn, who has denied making the remark, did not immediately return a call Friday seeking comment.

"She never told us she was there," Blackburn told The Associated Press last month. "I don't know why this man is coming forward 25 years later. I don't know what his motivation is, but he's simply mistaken."

MacDonald's wife, Kathryn, said she and her husband were "just overwhelmed" with the news, which she gave him in a brief telephone call Friday afternoon to the federal prison in Maryland where he is held.

"It's astonishing, wonderful," she said from her home in Columbia, Md. "It's given me back my faith that truth means something — truth means everything — and I know Jeff feels the same."

Lead attorney Tim Junkin said MacDonald's team will ask the federal court to vacate the conviction.

MacDonald, whose case was dramatized in the best-selling book and TV miniseries "Fatal Vision," responded to the ruling in a statement posted on a Web site devoted to exonerating him.

"We are grateful for the court's fair and thoughtful consideration, and are exhilarated that we will now be able to present all the evidence amassed since trial that demonstrates actual innocence," MacDonald said in the statement.

MacDonald, 62, is serving three consecutive life sentences in a federal prison for the murders of Colette MacDonald, 26, and their daughters Kimberley, 5, and Kristen, 2. He has argued that intruders killed his family in an attack that left him seriously injured.

According to MacDonald, one of the attackers was a woman with a long blond wig and floppy hat. He said he heard her say, "Acid is groovy, kill the pigs." Stoeckley, who died in 1983, fit the description, according to court papers.

Britt, now 67, said in an affidavit that he kept quiet for more than 25 years out of a sense of duty to people he worked with, but the secret eventually became too much to bear.

Britt said Stoeckley's interview with Blackburn was not the first time he heard her say she was in the MacDonald home the night of the murders. She told him the same story as he drove her from Greenville, S.C., to Raleigh for the trial and even described a hobby horse in the home, he said in the affidavit.

Also here is a link to some more news about the case:
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/search?p=Jeffrey+MacDonald&c=


Not talent. Genius maybe. You're talented, Thomas. The world is full of talented a**holes

reply

Did you read Fatal Justice? Did you know that Jeff MacDonald won a suit against Joe Mcginnis, the author of Fatal Vision? I too for the longest time believed that he was guilty. 23 years to be exact but after reading Fatal Justice and seeing all of the evidence that was suppressed, I definately had to rethink the way that I looked at this case. He deserves a new trial so that ALL of the evidence can be heard. It's hard to make a case when half of your evidence conveniently disappears.

reply

No, he didn't "win" a suit against McGuinness. The jury was hung on the first question. So he didn't keep him tied up in court for the rest of his life, McGuinness offered to settle for the $100,000 he already owed Mac and which was in escrow, and the insurance company paid the rest $225,000. Mac quickly settled for that amount, he was asking for $15 Million. He needed money badly. The Kassabs then sued MacDonald for wrongful death and won. MacDonald ended up receiving $50,000. Had he not sued, he would have gained $100,000.

Fatal Justice is not a very good nor accurate source of information on the MacDonald case. It was edited by him, MacDonald, therefore it's biased toward him. The prosecutors did not even receive so much as a phone call from the authors to verify the accuracy of the information MacDonald handed them.

Once again, there was no suppression of evidence. You would need to read the trial transcripts and the appeals.

Joe McGuinness sat through that trial, he heard and saw all the evidence. His book reflects the same, you can verify it with the trial transcripts. Joe McGuiness was not responsible for Macdonald's conviction.

It's not the size of the dog in the fight but the size of the fight in the dog

reply

The Fourth court accepted the brief for filing nothing more. He won't get a new trial. Even if he does, the prosecution still has all the evidence that convicted him and can nail him again, possibly for the unborn baby this time.


You should read the government's response to the motion. Here is a link

http://www.thejeffreymacdonaldcase.com/downloads/MacDonald_Master_12_21.pdf



It's not the size of the dog in the fight but the size of the fight in the dog

reply

I want some imperical freaking evidence that Helena was there-
a fingerprint, a hair.......ANYTHING!

reply

Cami - thanks for your quick responses & great info. I can't believe there are still people who think he's innocent. I'll never understand how he's able to continue to manipulate people even from prison.

FYI - I read "Fatal Justice," and I think the authors could teach Michael Moore a lesson in re-writing history.

reply

[deleted]