What happened next?


i liked this movie a lot since it showed the demise of people and the town got smaller and smaller. What do you think happened next for the 3 left? My guess is the mom died next due to her throwing up. i think it would have been interesting if it showed more of the town as it went along. Would everyone have died?

reply

The impression the film gives is that everyone in the town would die. They were all getting sick and there didn't appear to be any hope in sight. For all we know, they might be the last surviving community in the area. Obviously no help was coming.

reply

If you reference what the movie says about "RAD" numbers...they are talking about the radiation exposure. Depending on how long the RAD numbers were high and how the wind current would keep fall out in the area would determine whether everyone will die or not.

I think the point is: even if the nuclear bombs don't kill you the radiation exposure will eventually kill you. If they had left the area to live in to an area that had lower RAD dosages per hour or lived in a bomb shelter...they wouldn't have been exposed to it as much and would have lived longer. In the movie they didn't want to leave their home and possibly encouter an even worse environment.(Being killed for their car, food, possessions?)

The movie shows one possible outcome of how a group (small hamlet, in this case) would react to nuclear war. Other possibilities are: 1) that everyone would leave (they do show alot of people leaving),2) that anarchy would reign (although they show the one kid stealing the batteries and bike and trying to steal food) and 3)there wouldn't be the cooperation to help others(instead of showing the food being distributed to everyone equally, they could have shown that people began to loot all the stores).

It's hard to say how people would react. May be they would react differently in larger cities where people didn't feel close as a community and where there wasn't people willing to decide on how to help each other.



Sarcasm is anger's ugly cousin... from now on, unacceptable.

reply

i really wanted to know what happened to the 3 people left. Who would die next and how the others would cope with it. The only main characters left were those 3 and the priest i beleive. I think this would have been ever better as a miniseries. Anyone else think that?

reply

I wonder what happend to the Kevin Costner and Rebecca Mornray characters. During the movie, after the death of their baby, they set out to meet up with some survialist groups out in the country.

I always, like to think, that a sequal to this movie would be: The Postman. Where as the sequel would center around the Cosnter character of course.



They call him the giggler, he laughs when he runs.

reply

They probably drove until either they ran out of gas or their car broke down. They said something about refugee camps in Canada but that was probably rumor. San Francisco to the Canadian border 950 miles so you would need more than one tank of gas . Most likely the Canadian government or what ever was left of it would have closed their borders and they would have run out of gas before they got anywhere near it.

reply

Wow! Relpying to an 18 year old post?😱

reply

In all reality, as close to the blast as they were (within visual distance of it) they should have died fairly early on in the movie (of course then there would not have been a movie I guess). The children died earlier as they were much more vulnerable to radiation (as was seen later due to the real life reactor meltdown near Kiev, Ukraine). Now, if the winds had not brought the fallout to their town then there would have been very few, if any, deaths. However, the film certainly implies that the radiation from the San Francisco blast did reach their small town.

reply

I am not a nuclear weapons expert, but have done considerable research relative to the probable effects of a nuclear exchange on those living at and near ground zero.

Nuclear devices fall into several categories. The most basic (and weakest) are single-stage fission devices. When these devices detonate, conventional explosives are utilized to create a supercritical mass, and an "initiator" causes a neutron flux that bombards the supercritical mass with neutrons, thereby initiating the fission chain reaction that releases gamma rays, x-rays, alpha, beta, and gamma radiation. The result is the formation of a massive fireball, which grows in diameter extremely rapidly and which acts as a piston, pushing air away from the center of the fireball (the immediate shock wave is referred to as a hydrodynamic front, and it is due to the fact that the hydrodynamic front forms first within the fireball and then expands until it obscures the fireball, that such a detonation results in a "double-pulse" of light).

Two such improvised devices were dropped on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, causing utter devastation. However, many people survived, despite being exposed to considerable doses of radiation.

More "sophisticated" devices, commonly referred to as "thermonuclear" devices, utilize a fission reaction (i.e. the power of a single-stage weapon) to induce a fusion reaction. Without getting too technical, the fissile material is compressed inwards by high explosive, resulting in the formation of a supercritical mass; the intiator then creates the neutron flux necessary to initiate the fission reaction, which in turn generates sufficient heat and pressure to induce a fusion reaction of the surrounding, fusile material. The so-called "ablation" design causes half of the fusile material to blow outwards, creating pressures that cause the other half of the fusile material to implode into the fission reaction, which in turn initiates a fusion reaction of terrible power. Such a double-staged weapon is much more powerful than a single stage weapon.

The worst of the bombs (utilizting the so-called "Teller-Ulam" design) add a third, fission stage to the process, and it is these bombs that scatter radioactive debris over a massive area.

However, it is the type of radiation that is important in estimating mortality and morbidity. Most detonations involving a nuclear exchange would probably involve so-called "airbursts" (in which the fireball never touches the ground). An airburst does not kick up a huge cloud of radio-contaminated dust, soot, earth, and rubble (as does a ground burst). Most of the radiation is released in the form of soft x-rays, which are rapidly absorbed by the surrounding atmosphere. The remainder of the radiation takes the form of alpha, beta, and gamma radiation, and most of the fallout has a rapid half-life (the time it takes for the amount of radioactive material to decay to half of the original amount). Gamma radiation can travel through several feet of concrete, and it is this type of radiation that incapacitates and kills people who survive the overpressure and the thermal pulse.

In a full-blown nuclear war between two superpowers, most of the detonations would take the form of airbursts. People close to ground zero who are not shieled from the gamma radiation, or who come into contact with contaminated dust particles (through eating or breathing), will almost certainly die within hours. People who are shielded would be able to emerge after three or four days. Unfortunately, most people would not know the direction of the prevailing winds, and would not be able to escape the fallout from a three-stage weapon.

However, people living a considerable distance away from the targets would probably survive, since alpha radiation and beta radiation rapidly decays, and gamma radiation does not travel vast distances. So much would depend on whether or not there were grounbursts (which would kick up contaminated dust, soot, and debris).

I know that the above sounds incredibly detached, dry, and insensitive. However, I am trying to explain an extremely emotionally upsetting scenario in terms which can be understood.

All of this is academic, however. The emotional power of "Testament" does not turn on the theoretical accuracy of the plot background. It turns on the assumption of the worst possible case -- always a wise assumption to make in cases such as this, when so much is at stake -- combined with a harrowing account of life in a world where the future has disappeared in a blaze of white light. Jane Alexander deserved the Oscar for which she was nominated. Why she did not receive it, I will never understand....


Philip Chandler

reply

[deleted]

3 left?
you mean mom, son and hiroshi?
they all dead.
suicide in garage.
don't you see it?
the last scene, where hiroshi found the bear and gave it to mom, it is dream.
le dernier rêve qu'ils ont fait ensemble juste avant de mourir...

reply

i don't think its a dream. The ending at the table made me believe that even out of their situation, they still were trying to live life until the end.

reply

it is the dream man.
what did mom do before starting the car?
she closed the garage and she blocked up it.
why?

reply

Uh...this wasn't a dream. She was going to kill them all but then just couldn't do it. Perhaps you went to the bathroom at this critical point in the story.

MOVIES BY THE MINUTE --> http://moviesbytheminute.blogspot.com

reply


It was most emphatically not a dream. Carol turned off the key after acknowledging that she simply could not go through with the suicide attempt.

PHILIP CHANDLER

reply

[deleted]

The last scene gave me an impression of the End for the three of them (probably died soon after) and essentially the End for the entire town and mankind in general I believe....The film kept getting darker and darker as it went on....the last 10-15 minutes were all shot in nighttime or in darkly-lit scenes, creating a twilight-like mood...There was hardly anyone left in the town anyway, maybe they were the last ones left alive?

reply

[deleted]

In the garage suicide scene, Carol said she couldn't go through with it and Brad agreed. The next scene shows them celebrating Brad's birthday with candles in cupcakes and Hiroshi brings in the bear. Then the flashback movie scene, which always appeared when someone died. The short story on which the movie is based on doesn't say who died last. Carol's diary entry stops in the middle of a sentence.

reply

Did you not see her say she could not commit suicide? It was not a dream.

"Do All Things For God's Glory"-1 Corinthians 10:31
I try doing this with my posts

reply

j'ai revu le film tout à l'heure et...
vous avez raison.

reply

[deleted]

in the post above yours, merlemerle said he/she watched the movie again and agrees with Carol-Ann ("vous avez raison" means "you are right")

reply


I don't know if it was due to her being Christian ... just to her being a human, and a mom, and realizing that it was her duty to try to keep the kids alive as long as possible, no matter what.

reply

[deleted]

I can absolutely promise you that there is a God. The world is in the mess it's in (war, weapons of destruction) because of sin, beginning with Adam and Eve's sin in the Garden of Eden.

reply

[deleted]

I've never been able to find the short story that the move is based on. I would like to read it.

reply

"The last scene gave me an impression of the End for the three of them (probably died soon after) and essentially the End for the entire town and mankind in general I believe...."

I think what comes next is up to each person to decide.

The end message for me was they did not give up hope. If they died and nobody ransacked their home, then the people who find their bodies would notice an orderly home with people trying to cope. They did not turn into lawless thugs. They did not kill themselves. They kept their dignity and respect for one another.

reply